Doxxing, Privacy and Gendered Harassment. The Shock and Normalization of Veillance Cultures

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Stine Eckert, Jade Metzger-Riftkin
{"title":"Doxxing, Privacy and Gendered Harassment. The Shock and Normalization of Veillance Cultures","authors":"Stine Eckert, Jade Metzger-Riftkin","doi":"10.5771/1615-634x-2020-3-273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We conducted 15 in-depth interviews with women and men in Germany, Switzerland, Finland, Canada, and the United States who were victims of doxxing. The goal was to understand their experiences, their responses, and the consequences they faced. We understand doxxing as a complex, gendered communicative process of harassment. Doxxers use digital media technologies to expose personal information without consent given by those to whom the personal information belongs. We apply a feminist approach to surveillance studies to doxxing, focusing on the constructions of daily, habitual, and ubiquitous assemblages of veillances that disproportionately impact vulnerable individuals. We found that gendered aspects shaped the flow and suspected intent of doxxing and subsequent harassment. Victims experienced uncertainty, loss of control, and fear, while law enforcement and social media providers only helped in a few cases to pursue doxxers or remove unwanted personal information. We ultimately extend the definition of doxxing by considering the ubiquitous nature of information shared online in gendered veillance cultures. Our findings lead us to advocate for protecting the contextual integrity of entering personal information into expected, intentional, or desired spaces.","PeriodicalId":36375,"journal":{"name":"Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2020-3-273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

We conducted 15 in-depth interviews with women and men in Germany, Switzerland, Finland, Canada, and the United States who were victims of doxxing. The goal was to understand their experiences, their responses, and the consequences they faced. We understand doxxing as a complex, gendered communicative process of harassment. Doxxers use digital media technologies to expose personal information without consent given by those to whom the personal information belongs. We apply a feminist approach to surveillance studies to doxxing, focusing on the constructions of daily, habitual, and ubiquitous assemblages of veillances that disproportionately impact vulnerable individuals. We found that gendered aspects shaped the flow and suspected intent of doxxing and subsequent harassment. Victims experienced uncertainty, loss of control, and fear, while law enforcement and social media providers only helped in a few cases to pursue doxxers or remove unwanted personal information. We ultimately extend the definition of doxxing by considering the ubiquitous nature of information shared online in gendered veillance cultures. Our findings lead us to advocate for protecting the contextual integrity of entering personal information into expected, intentional, or desired spaces.
Doxxing,隐私和性别骚扰。面纱文化的冲击与规范
我们对德国、瑞士、芬兰、加拿大和美国的多克星受害者进行了15次深入采访。目的是了解他们的经历、反应和面临的后果。我们将doxxing理解为一个复杂的、性别化的骚扰交流过程。Doxxers在未经个人信息所属人员同意的情况下,使用数字媒体技术暴露个人信息。我们将女权主义方法应用于多克星的监测研究,重点关注日常、习惯性和普遍存在的面纱组合的构建,这些面纱对弱势个体产生了不成比例的影响。我们发现,性别因素塑造了多兴和随后骚扰的流动和可疑意图。受害者经历了不确定性、失控和恐惧,而执法部门和社交媒体提供商只在少数情况下帮助追查兴奋剂或删除不需要的个人信息。我们最终通过考虑性别面纱文化中在线共享信息的普遍性来扩展doxxing的定义。我们的研究结果使我们倡导保护将个人信息输入预期、有意或期望空间的上下文完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft
Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信