Local environmental NGO roles in biodiversity governance: a Czech-German comparison

IF 0.7 Q3 GEOGRAPHY
GeoScape Pub Date : 2017-06-01 DOI:10.1515/geosc-2017-0001
L. Slavíková, R. Syrbe, J. Slavík, Astrid Berens
{"title":"Local environmental NGO roles in biodiversity governance: a Czech-German comparison","authors":"L. Slavíková, R. Syrbe, J. Slavík, Astrid Berens","doi":"10.1515/geosc-2017-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Recently, the role of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)s in environmental governance has been widely investigated, especially regarding the issue of mandatory public participation in policy-making within a European context. This paper aims to redirect scientific attention from their pure participation to their field actions, i.e., to the role they play in actual natural resource management, especially at the local level, and reframe local environmental NGO roles and positions based on the criteria for scale and influence. More specifically, this paper seeks to identify factors that promote NGOs as effective complements in the protection of state biodiversity and stresses local impacts of different governance schemes. Determining factors were investigated through a series of in-depth case studies undertaken in the Czech-German border region of the eastern Krušné hory Mts. (Erzgebirge, Ore Mts.). Rather than a quantitatively oriented survey among NGOs, this study focused primarily on a specific territory and, subsequently, on the identification of relevant actor performance (including NGO representatives) within this territory. The method applied for comparison was the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework (IAD Framework). This design enabled a comparison of different social practices in the homogeneous ecosystem present on both sides of the border and captured the influence of specific social and historical cross-border features on environmental NGO performance.","PeriodicalId":42291,"journal":{"name":"GeoScape","volume":"11 1","pages":"1 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/geosc-2017-0001","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeoScape","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/geosc-2017-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Abstract Recently, the role of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)s in environmental governance has been widely investigated, especially regarding the issue of mandatory public participation in policy-making within a European context. This paper aims to redirect scientific attention from their pure participation to their field actions, i.e., to the role they play in actual natural resource management, especially at the local level, and reframe local environmental NGO roles and positions based on the criteria for scale and influence. More specifically, this paper seeks to identify factors that promote NGOs as effective complements in the protection of state biodiversity and stresses local impacts of different governance schemes. Determining factors were investigated through a series of in-depth case studies undertaken in the Czech-German border region of the eastern Krušné hory Mts. (Erzgebirge, Ore Mts.). Rather than a quantitatively oriented survey among NGOs, this study focused primarily on a specific territory and, subsequently, on the identification of relevant actor performance (including NGO representatives) within this territory. The method applied for comparison was the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework (IAD Framework). This design enabled a comparison of different social practices in the homogeneous ecosystem present on both sides of the border and captured the influence of specific social and historical cross-border features on environmental NGO performance.
地方环境非政府组织在生物多样性治理中的作用:捷克与德国的比较
最近,非政府组织(ngo)在环境治理中的作用得到了广泛的研究,特别是关于欧洲环境下公众参与政策制定的强制性问题。本文旨在将科学关注从它们的纯粹参与转移到它们的实地行动上,即它们在实际自然资源管理中发挥的作用,特别是在地方一级,并根据规模和影响力的标准重新定义地方环境非政府组织的角色和立场。更具体地说,本文试图找出促进非政府组织成为国家生物多样性保护的有效补充的因素,并强调不同治理方案的地方影响。通过在捷克-德国东部Krušné霍利山边境地区(俄勒冈州Erzgebirge)进行的一系列深入案例研究,对决定因素进行了调查。本研究不是在非政府组织中进行以数量为导向的调查,而是主要关注一个特定领域,然后确定该领域内相关行动者的表现(包括非政府组织代表)。所采用的比较方法是体制分析和发展框架(IAD框架)。该设计能够比较边界两侧同质生态系统中的不同社会实践,并捕捉特定的社会和历史跨境特征对环境非政府组织绩效的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GeoScape
GeoScape GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
7
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信