Inequalities in Early Childhood Education and Care in Argentina and the United Kingdom (2010-2020)

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Foro de Educacion Pub Date : 2021-12-28 DOI:10.14516/fde.882
Ianina Tuñón, Carolina Emilia Martínez
{"title":"Inequalities in Early Childhood Education and Care in Argentina and the United Kingdom (2010-2020)","authors":"Ianina Tuñón, Carolina Emilia Martínez","doi":"10.14516/fde.882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although there is a global agenda which tends to promote early childhood education and investment in early childhood, regulations and institutions are disparate between countries, and that does not seem to be tied to social welfare levels, exclusively. After studying existing evidence on educational inequalities in Argentina and the United Kingdom, in this article we present a comparative analysis of the education system’s key components, i.e., legislation, public investment, coverage levels, professionalization, and characteristics of programs aimed at children, in relation with the per capita household income. The main findings are that schooling rates are higher in the UK than in Argentina, and social inequalities are somewhat lower. However, in both cases children who are not enrolled are concentrated in the most vulnerable households. In the UK, there is a more homogeneous and professionalized system, with official assessment and supervision, international quality standards, and notable progress in literacy, but the eligibility criteria for childcare funding does not prioritize the right of the child. Instead, it is based on parents’ labor inclusion. On the other hand, Argentina is characterized by regulatory advances and free education. However, there is insufficient supply, and informal systems are widespread among vulnerable populations, which lack guidance and supervision, and virtually provide welfare aid rather than educational services.","PeriodicalId":43476,"journal":{"name":"Foro de Educacion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foro de Educacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14516/fde.882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although there is a global agenda which tends to promote early childhood education and investment in early childhood, regulations and institutions are disparate between countries, and that does not seem to be tied to social welfare levels, exclusively. After studying existing evidence on educational inequalities in Argentina and the United Kingdom, in this article we present a comparative analysis of the education system’s key components, i.e., legislation, public investment, coverage levels, professionalization, and characteristics of programs aimed at children, in relation with the per capita household income. The main findings are that schooling rates are higher in the UK than in Argentina, and social inequalities are somewhat lower. However, in both cases children who are not enrolled are concentrated in the most vulnerable households. In the UK, there is a more homogeneous and professionalized system, with official assessment and supervision, international quality standards, and notable progress in literacy, but the eligibility criteria for childcare funding does not prioritize the right of the child. Instead, it is based on parents’ labor inclusion. On the other hand, Argentina is characterized by regulatory advances and free education. However, there is insufficient supply, and informal systems are widespread among vulnerable populations, which lack guidance and supervision, and virtually provide welfare aid rather than educational services.
阿根廷和英国幼儿教育和照料方面的不平等(2010-2020年)
虽然有一个促进幼儿教育和幼儿投资的全球议程,但各国的规章和体制各不相同,而且这似乎并不完全与社会福利水平有关。在研究了阿根廷和英国教育不平等的现有证据后,本文对教育系统的关键组成部分进行了比较分析,即立法、公共投资、覆盖水平、专业化和针对儿童的项目的特征,以及与人均家庭收入的关系。研究的主要发现是,英国的入学率高于阿根廷,社会不平等程度也相对较低。然而,在这两种情况下,未登记的儿童都集中在最脆弱的家庭。在英国,有一个更加同质化和专业化的体系,有官方的评估和监督,有国际质量标准,在扫盲方面取得了显著进步,但儿童保育基金的资格标准并没有优先考虑儿童的权利。相反,它是以父母的劳动包容为基础的。另一方面,阿根廷的特点是监管进步和免费教育。但是,供应不足,在弱势群体中非正规制度普遍存在,缺乏指导和监督,实际上提供的是福利援助而不是教育服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foro de Educacion
Foro de Educacion EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信