Effectiveness of QF-PCR, Karyotyping and Microarray in Detecting Clinically Significant Chromosomal Aberrations of Foetuses with Abnormal Findings on Ultrasound

Salas Pc, I. Vázquez-Rico, A. Leon-Justel, P. Carreto-Alba, R. Granell-Escobar
{"title":"Effectiveness of QF-PCR, Karyotyping and Microarray in Detecting Clinically Significant Chromosomal Aberrations of Foetuses with Abnormal Findings on Ultrasound","authors":"Salas Pc, I. Vázquez-Rico, A. Leon-Justel, P. Carreto-Alba, R. Granell-Escobar","doi":"10.4172/1747-0862.1000344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate in our area the clinical utility of QF-PCR, karyotyping and CMA for detecting chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with abnormal findings on first or second trimester ultrasound. \nMethods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 139 pregnancies with fetal structural anomaly or ultrasound markers. \nResults: Chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 28 patients (20.1% of all cases). Twenty-four of theses abnormalities (17.2% of total) were aneuploidies detected by QF-PCR. The remaining 4 chromosomal abnormalities (2.9% of cases) identified in this study were detected by CMA and/or by karyotyping, and only two genomic aberrations of 28 (1.4%) were identified by CMA but not by QF-PCR and conventional cytogenetics. \nConclusion: QF-PCR must remain as the first-line test in prenatal diagnosis. Further studies with a bigger number of cases are desirable to corroborate the low additional detection rate of CMA analysis in our area.","PeriodicalId":88269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of molecular and genetic medicine : an international journal of biomedical research","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/1747-0862.1000344","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of molecular and genetic medicine : an international journal of biomedical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/1747-0862.1000344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate in our area the clinical utility of QF-PCR, karyotyping and CMA for detecting chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with abnormal findings on first or second trimester ultrasound. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 139 pregnancies with fetal structural anomaly or ultrasound markers. Results: Chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 28 patients (20.1% of all cases). Twenty-four of theses abnormalities (17.2% of total) were aneuploidies detected by QF-PCR. The remaining 4 chromosomal abnormalities (2.9% of cases) identified in this study were detected by CMA and/or by karyotyping, and only two genomic aberrations of 28 (1.4%) were identified by CMA but not by QF-PCR and conventional cytogenetics. Conclusion: QF-PCR must remain as the first-line test in prenatal diagnosis. Further studies with a bigger number of cases are desirable to corroborate the low additional detection rate of CMA analysis in our area.
QF-PCR、核型分析和微阵列技术检测超声异常胎儿临床显著染色体畸变的效果
目的:本研究旨在探讨QF-PCR、核型分析和CMA在检测妊娠早期或中期超声异常胎儿染色体畸变方面的临床应用。方法:我们对139例有胎儿结构异常或超声标记的妊娠进行了回顾性分析。结果:发现28例患者染色体异常,占全部病例的20.1%。这些异常中有24例(占总数的17.2%)是通过QF-PCR检测到的非整倍体。本研究中发现的其余4种染色体异常(2.9%的病例)通过CMA和/或核型分析进行了检测,并且只有28种基因组畸变(1.4%)由CMA鉴定,但没有通过QF-PCR和常规细胞遗传学鉴定。结论:QF-PCR应继续作为产前诊断的一线检测手段。需要对更多病例进行进一步研究,以证实我们地区CMA分析的低附加检测率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信