Pre-service mathematics teachers' views of nature of science in the context of COVID-19

Q3 Social Sciences
O. Sengul
{"title":"Pre-service mathematics teachers' views of nature of science in the context of COVID-19","authors":"O. Sengul","doi":"10.30935/scimath/12982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A framework for K-12 science education (National Research Council [NRC], 2012) supports science learning on social and political issues to make informed decisions and solve problems. Socio-scientific issues have been considered as a context to teach characteristics of nature of science (NOS). This study is a qualitative study in nature to examine how pre-service mathematics teachers define science and address different aspects of science and scientific literacy in the context of coronavirus (COVID-19). Data sources included written reports and reflections on basic science-related questions. Responses from 50 pre-service mathematics teachers were analyzed through thematic analysis. The results indicated that pre-service mathematics teachers defined science as a product in the form of systematic knowledge, fact or theories-laws-models, and they provided informed or partially informed views on empirical, sociocultural, tentativeness, and subjectivity aspects by referring to cognitive, developmental, and sociocultural dimensions of science literacy. Pre-service mathematics teachers’ definition of science as accumulated knowledge was not aligned with their desirable views on aspects of NOS. The study suggests possible implications for further studies.","PeriodicalId":36049,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A framework for K-12 science education (National Research Council [NRC], 2012) supports science learning on social and political issues to make informed decisions and solve problems. Socio-scientific issues have been considered as a context to teach characteristics of nature of science (NOS). This study is a qualitative study in nature to examine how pre-service mathematics teachers define science and address different aspects of science and scientific literacy in the context of coronavirus (COVID-19). Data sources included written reports and reflections on basic science-related questions. Responses from 50 pre-service mathematics teachers were analyzed through thematic analysis. The results indicated that pre-service mathematics teachers defined science as a product in the form of systematic knowledge, fact or theories-laws-models, and they provided informed or partially informed views on empirical, sociocultural, tentativeness, and subjectivity aspects by referring to cognitive, developmental, and sociocultural dimensions of science literacy. Pre-service mathematics teachers’ definition of science as accumulated knowledge was not aligned with their desirable views on aspects of NOS. The study suggests possible implications for further studies.
新冠肺炎背景下职前数学教师的科学本质观
K-12科学教育框架(国家研究委员会[NCR],2012)支持社会和政治问题的科学学习,以做出明智的决定并解决问题。社会科学问题被认为是教授科学本质特征的一个背景。本研究本质上是一项定性研究,旨在研究职前数学教师如何在冠状病毒(新冠肺炎)的背景下定义科学,并解决科学和科学素养的不同方面。数据来源包括书面报告和对基础科学相关问题的思考。通过主题分析对50名职前数学教师的回答进行了分析。研究结果表明,职前数学教师以系统知识、事实或理论规律模型的形式将科学定义为一种产品,他们通过参考科学素养的认知、发展和社会文化维度,在经验、社会文化、推测性和主观性方面提供了知情或部分知情的观点。职前数学教师将科学定义为积累的知识,这与他们对NOS各方面的理想看法不一致。该研究表明,这可能对进一步的研究有启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信