Finite Element Study to Compare Stress Distribution and Displacement in the Palatal Implant in Lingual Orthodontics in Four Different Combinations of Palatal Implant and Lever Arm

Ashish Kushwah, Mukesh Kumar, Shruti Premasagar, Sonika Sharma, Sumit Tomar, P. Bhushan
{"title":"Finite Element Study to Compare Stress Distribution and Displacement in the Palatal Implant in Lingual Orthodontics in Four Different Combinations of Palatal Implant and Lever Arm","authors":"Ashish Kushwah, Mukesh Kumar, Shruti Premasagar, Sonika Sharma, Sumit Tomar, P. Bhushan","doi":"10.3126/ojn.v12i1.47481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The choice of orthodontic appliance depends upon the patients age, profession and availability of them. Lingual orthodontic appliances are preferred over labial by patients because of its invisibility. The aim of this research is to compare the Von Mises stress distribution and displacement of palatal implants in the lingual orthodontic system among four different combinations of palatal implant and lever arm.\nMaterials and Method: Four Finite element models were constructed for the bilaterally extracted first premolar maxillary arch. In all these models 0.018” slot lingual brackets were placed at the center of the clinical crown. A similar retraction force (150gm) was applied with the help of NiTi closed coil spring for all the models but the length of the lever arm vary as well as the palatal implant position also varies in these models. Finite element analysis was then performed to compare the Von Mises stress distribution, and displacement of the palatal implant using ANSYS 12.1 software.\nResult: In this study, displacement was the same (0.0005 mm) for all four models. Highest amount von mises stress was observed in Model 3 (3.4798 MPa) as a comparison to Model 1 (2.5442 MPa), Model 2 (2.5018 MPa), and Model 4 (3.3854 MPa). The stress value for the palatal implant was within the acceptable fatigue limit of the titanium of 193 MPa therefore all four models combination was safe for the clinical application.\nConclusion: Double palatal implant systems were more effective in comparison to the single palatal implant system in lingual orthodontics. In this study, we found that the displacement of the palatal implants was not affected by the length of the lever-arm and the amount of stress was decreased when we increase the length of the lever-arm.","PeriodicalId":31197,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontic Journal of Nepal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontic Journal of Nepal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/ojn.v12i1.47481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The choice of orthodontic appliance depends upon the patients age, profession and availability of them. Lingual orthodontic appliances are preferred over labial by patients because of its invisibility. The aim of this research is to compare the Von Mises stress distribution and displacement of palatal implants in the lingual orthodontic system among four different combinations of palatal implant and lever arm. Materials and Method: Four Finite element models were constructed for the bilaterally extracted first premolar maxillary arch. In all these models 0.018” slot lingual brackets were placed at the center of the clinical crown. A similar retraction force (150gm) was applied with the help of NiTi closed coil spring for all the models but the length of the lever arm vary as well as the palatal implant position also varies in these models. Finite element analysis was then performed to compare the Von Mises stress distribution, and displacement of the palatal implant using ANSYS 12.1 software. Result: In this study, displacement was the same (0.0005 mm) for all four models. Highest amount von mises stress was observed in Model 3 (3.4798 MPa) as a comparison to Model 1 (2.5442 MPa), Model 2 (2.5018 MPa), and Model 4 (3.3854 MPa). The stress value for the palatal implant was within the acceptable fatigue limit of the titanium of 193 MPa therefore all four models combination was safe for the clinical application. Conclusion: Double palatal implant systems were more effective in comparison to the single palatal implant system in lingual orthodontics. In this study, we found that the displacement of the palatal implants was not affected by the length of the lever-arm and the amount of stress was decreased when we increase the length of the lever-arm.
舌正畸中腭种植体与杠杆臂四种不同组合的应力分布和位移的有限元比较研究
正畸矫治器的选择取决于患者的年龄、职业和矫治器的可用性。由于舌形矫治器的不可见性,患者更倾向于使用舌形矫治器。本研究的目的是比较四种不同的腭种植体和杠杆臂组合在舌正畸系统中的Von Mises应力分布和位移。材料与方法:建立4个双侧拔除第一前磨牙上颌弓的有限元模型。在所有这些模型中,在临床冠的中心放置0.018”槽舌托槽。在NiTi闭合线圈弹簧的帮助下,所有模型都施加了类似的150gm的回拉力,但这些模型的杠杆臂长度和腭种植体位置也有所不同。利用ANSYS 12.1软件进行有限元分析,比较Von Mises应力分布和腭种植体的位移。结果:在本研究中,四种模型的位移相同(0.0005 mm)。与模型1 (2.5442 MPa)、模型2 (2.5018 MPa)和模型4 (3.3854 MPa)相比,模型3的von mises应力最大(3.4798 MPa)。腭种植体的应力值均在钛合金可接受的疲劳极限193 MPa以内,因此四种模型组合均可安全用于临床应用。结论:双腭种植体系统比单腭种植体系统在舌正畸治疗中更有效。在本研究中,我们发现腭种植体的位移不受杠杆臂长度的影响,并且随着杠杆臂长度的增加,应力量减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书