Derick Yongabi , Nathalie Mertens , Ronald Peeters
{"title":"Reproducibility of T1 relaxation times in diagnostic MRI: A phantom study","authors":"Derick Yongabi , Nathalie Mertens , Ronald Peeters","doi":"10.1016/j.phmed.2021.100038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>T<sub>1</sub> mapping is crucial for many quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures. However, studies have reported wide T<sub>1</sub> variations, both <em>in vivo</em> and <em>in vitro</em>. Since clinical decisions depend on T<sub>1</sub> relaxation times, evaluating the factors affecting their reproducibility is necessary. Available studies are limited in that they do not provide a comparative perspective on the variation of T<sub>1</sub> relaxation times as a function of relevant parameters, such as pulse sequence type, magnetic field strength and how their interplay with the scanner model affects the resulting T<sub>1</sub> values. To address these gaps, we imaged two phantoms modelling T<sub>1</sub> of different samples at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using fast and slow inversion recovery (IR) sequences. The results show that T<sub>1</sub> relaxation times from 3.0 T scanners are accurate and reproducible in terms of the expected reference values and when compared between different scanner models. Similarly, T<sub>1</sub> values measured with the two pulse sequences were similar for all 3.0 T scanners. On the contrary, 1.5 T scanners exhibited larger discrepancies in the measured T<sub>1</sub> compared with the reference values. In addition, 1.5 T scanners displayed less reproducibility in T<sub>1</sub> relaxation time measurements across different 1.5 T scanners, and pulse sequences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37787,"journal":{"name":"Physics in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100038"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.phmed.2021.100038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352451021000044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
T1 mapping is crucial for many quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures. However, studies have reported wide T1 variations, both in vivo and in vitro. Since clinical decisions depend on T1 relaxation times, evaluating the factors affecting their reproducibility is necessary. Available studies are limited in that they do not provide a comparative perspective on the variation of T1 relaxation times as a function of relevant parameters, such as pulse sequence type, magnetic field strength and how their interplay with the scanner model affects the resulting T1 values. To address these gaps, we imaged two phantoms modelling T1 of different samples at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using fast and slow inversion recovery (IR) sequences. The results show that T1 relaxation times from 3.0 T scanners are accurate and reproducible in terms of the expected reference values and when compared between different scanner models. Similarly, T1 values measured with the two pulse sequences were similar for all 3.0 T scanners. On the contrary, 1.5 T scanners exhibited larger discrepancies in the measured T1 compared with the reference values. In addition, 1.5 T scanners displayed less reproducibility in T1 relaxation time measurements across different 1.5 T scanners, and pulse sequences.
期刊介绍:
The scope of Physics in Medicine consists of the application of theoretical and practical physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: Physics of Imaging Ultrasonic imaging, Optical imaging, X-ray imaging, Fluorescence Physics of Electromagnetics Neural Engineering, Signal analysis in Medicine, Electromagnetics and the nerve system, Quantum Electronics Physics of Therapy Ultrasonic therapy, Vibrational medicine, Laser Physics Physics of Materials and Mechanics Physics of impact and injuries, Physics of proteins, Metamaterials, Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Biomedical Materials, Physics of vascular and cerebrovascular diseases, Micromechanics and Micro engineering, Microfluidics in medicine, Mechanics of the human body, Rotary molecular motors, Biological physics, Physics of bio fabrication and regenerative medicine Physics of Instrumentation Engineering of instruments, Physical effects of the application of instruments, Measurement Science and Technology, Physics of micro-labs and bioanalytical sensor devices, Optical instrumentation, Ultrasound instruments Physics of Hearing and Seeing Acoustics and hearing, Physics of hearing aids, Optics and vision, Physics of vision aids Physics of Space Medicine Space physiology, Space medicine related Physics.