The Canadian Social Work Review: A Canadian Character of Social Work?

IF 2.3 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
Jeanette Schmid, Marie-Christine Bois
{"title":"The Canadian Social Work Review: A Canadian Character of Social Work?","authors":"Jeanette Schmid, Marie-Christine Bois","doi":"10.1080/10428232.2022.2062695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Noting that scholarly journals represent a particular repository of knowledge, we use content analysis to explore the constructions of social work represented in the Canadian Social Work Review – Revue canadienne de service social over 2010–2019. This journal is the only formal bilingual (French-English), peer-reviewed social work journal in the country. Rather than broadly reflecting Canadian realities and contexts, the emerging trends imply specific regional and social work program dominance, both in terms of authorship and issues explored. In part this is related to English-French language parity having been achieved, though this has led to other unintended consequences. While the published articles represent critical discourses and qualitative approaches are preferred, many articles do not address power, oppression and representation, particularly with regard to Indigenous, racialized and gendered groups. We conclude that the journal, whilst leaning toward a critical representation of social work, also reflects mainstream, dominant views of Canadian social work, the journal thus portraying the contested nature of Canadian social work. Mechanisms that add to existing Editorial Board efforts for further strengthening a critically interrogative lens may be required. Other social work journals may want to consider the story they are telling the profession and the ways in which","PeriodicalId":44255,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","volume":"33 1","pages":"271 - 286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Progressive Human Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428232.2022.2062695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Noting that scholarly journals represent a particular repository of knowledge, we use content analysis to explore the constructions of social work represented in the Canadian Social Work Review – Revue canadienne de service social over 2010–2019. This journal is the only formal bilingual (French-English), peer-reviewed social work journal in the country. Rather than broadly reflecting Canadian realities and contexts, the emerging trends imply specific regional and social work program dominance, both in terms of authorship and issues explored. In part this is related to English-French language parity having been achieved, though this has led to other unintended consequences. While the published articles represent critical discourses and qualitative approaches are preferred, many articles do not address power, oppression and representation, particularly with regard to Indigenous, racialized and gendered groups. We conclude that the journal, whilst leaning toward a critical representation of social work, also reflects mainstream, dominant views of Canadian social work, the journal thus portraying the contested nature of Canadian social work. Mechanisms that add to existing Editorial Board efforts for further strengthening a critically interrogative lens may be required. Other social work journals may want to consider the story they are telling the profession and the ways in which
加拿大社会工作评论:社会工作的加拿大特色?
摘要注意到学术期刊代表了一个特定的知识库,我们使用内容分析来探索《加拿大社会工作评论》(Revue canadienne de service social over 2010-2019)中所代表的社会工作结构。该期刊是该国唯一一份正式的双语(法语-英语)、同行评审的社会工作期刊。新出现的趋势并没有广泛反映加拿大的现实和背景,而是意味着在作者和所探讨的问题方面,特定的地区和社会工作项目占据主导地位。这在一定程度上与英法语言平等有关,尽管这导致了其他意想不到的后果。虽然发表的文章代表了批判性的话语,更倾向于定性的方法,但许多文章没有涉及权力、压迫和代表性,特别是关于土著、种族化和性别化群体的文章。我们得出的结论是,该杂志在倾向于对社会工作进行批判性表述的同时,也反映了加拿大社会工作的主流、主导观点,从而描绘了加拿大社会作品的争议性质。可能需要建立机制,在现有编辑委员会的努力基础上进一步加强批判性提问的视角。其他社会工作期刊可能会考虑他们讲述的职业故事以及
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The only journal of its kind in the United States, the Journal of Progressive Human Services covers political, social, personal, and professional problems in human services from a progressive perspective. The journal stimulates debate about major social issues and contributes to the development of the analytical tools needed for building a caring society based on equality and justice. The journal"s contributors examine oppressed and vulnerable groups, struggles by workers and clients on the job and in the community, dilemmas of practice in conservative contexts, and strategies for ending racism, sexism, ageism, heterosexism, and discrimination of persons who are disabled and psychologically distressed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信