As Formas da Simpatia e o seu Papel na Compreensão das Vivências Alheias em Scheler

Q4 Social Sciences
Daniel Rodrigues Ramos
{"title":"As Formas da Simpatia e o seu Papel na Compreensão das Vivências Alheias em Scheler","authors":"Daniel Rodrigues Ramos","doi":"10.18065/2021V27N1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective is to describe the main features of the sympathy phenomenon from Max Scheler's phenomenology. The central problem is to show how sympathy shows itself as a privileged \"place\" for understanding the experiences of others, because it implies a psychic-affective unification with whom one sympathizes or welcomes. However, compassion and co-rejoicing cannot be understood as the apprehension of psychic contents unrelated to the reproduction of the feelings of the other, mistakenly equating sympathizing with affective contagion. Thus, first, some reasons and ways of transformations of anthropologies and historical consolidation of the modern ratio that led to such mistake are outlined. Then, after distinguishing the plural forms of sympathy, showing its law of internal reasoning, it is discussed in what sense sympathy is to suffer and to rejoice by spelling out its intentional structure. To know the other, however, is not only to unite affectionately with others, but the free decision, proper of a spiritual being, to take part in the opening of the personal being of others, to participate in their intentional acts. It follows, then, that sympathizing presupposes the supreme form of love. Palavras-chave : Feelings; sympathy; love; knowledge of each other.","PeriodicalId":38448,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Abordagem Gestaltica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Abordagem Gestaltica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18065/2021V27N1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective is to describe the main features of the sympathy phenomenon from Max Scheler's phenomenology. The central problem is to show how sympathy shows itself as a privileged "place" for understanding the experiences of others, because it implies a psychic-affective unification with whom one sympathizes or welcomes. However, compassion and co-rejoicing cannot be understood as the apprehension of psychic contents unrelated to the reproduction of the feelings of the other, mistakenly equating sympathizing with affective contagion. Thus, first, some reasons and ways of transformations of anthropologies and historical consolidation of the modern ratio that led to such mistake are outlined. Then, after distinguishing the plural forms of sympathy, showing its law of internal reasoning, it is discussed in what sense sympathy is to suffer and to rejoice by spelling out its intentional structure. To know the other, however, is not only to unite affectionately with others, but the free decision, proper of a spiritual being, to take part in the opening of the personal being of others, to participate in their intentional acts. It follows, then, that sympathizing presupposes the supreme form of love. Palavras-chave : Feelings; sympathy; love; knowledge of each other.
同情的形式及其在理解舍勒反常经历中的作用
目的是从舍勒现象学的角度来描述同情现象的主要特征。核心问题是展示同情如何表现为理解他人经历的特权“场所”,因为它意味着与同情或欢迎的人的心理情感统一。然而,同情和共同喜悦不能被理解为对与他人情感再现无关的精神内容的理解,错误地将同情等同于情感传染。因此,首先概述了导致这种错误的人类学转型和现代比例的历史巩固的一些原因和途径。然后,在区分同情的复数形式,揭示其内在推理规律后,通过阐明其意向结构,讨论了同情在什么意义上是痛苦和快乐。然而,认识他人,不仅是与他人亲切地团结在一起,而且是一种自由的决定,是一种精神存在的恰当方式,是参与他人个人存在的开放,参与他人的有意行为。因此,同情是以爱的最高形式为前提的。Palavras chave:感觉;同情爱相互了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista da Abordagem Gestaltica
Revista da Abordagem Gestaltica Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信