Challenging issues of integrity and identity of participants in non-synchronous online qualitative methods

Q2 Psychology
Abigail Jones , Line Caes , Tessa Rugg , Melanie Noel , Sharon Bateman , Abbie Jordan
{"title":"Challenging issues of integrity and identity of participants in non-synchronous online qualitative methods","authors":"Abigail Jones ,&nbsp;Line Caes ,&nbsp;Tessa Rugg ,&nbsp;Melanie Noel ,&nbsp;Sharon Bateman ,&nbsp;Abbie Jordan","doi":"10.1016/j.metip.2021.100072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Qualitative data collection is increasingly occurring online, with data collection methods often lacking the synchronous contact between researchers and participants present in more traditional methods of qualitative data collection such as face-to-face interviews. Despite numerous benefits of non-synchronous online methods of qualitative data collection, such methods also pose unique challenges concerning participant eligibility and data quality in the qualitative domain. Due to a longer tradition of conducting non-synchronous quantitative online data collection, researchers have discussed issues related to data quality for use within quantitative research, and developed techniques to address such issues. However, such discussions have not taken place within qualitative research and due to the differences in types of data and theoretical underpinnings, only some of the techniques developed in quantitative research can be appropriately applied in qualitative research. In this paper, we address this knowledge gap by providing an important ‘how to guide’, presenting techniques to help address threats to data quality and integrity in non-synchronous online qualitative research. We start by outlining techniques developed for use in quantitative research that can be appropriately transferred to qualitative paradigms, before proposing techniques to manage challenges faced specifically by non-synchronous online qualitative research. We go on to discuss some of the potential pitfalls which can prevent the implementation of these techniques and how to overcome them. Finally, we urge researchers to be transparent about the techniques they implement to optimise data quality and to adopt a proactive rather than reactive approach to maximising data quality in qualitative research studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93338,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100072"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100072","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260121000291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Qualitative data collection is increasingly occurring online, with data collection methods often lacking the synchronous contact between researchers and participants present in more traditional methods of qualitative data collection such as face-to-face interviews. Despite numerous benefits of non-synchronous online methods of qualitative data collection, such methods also pose unique challenges concerning participant eligibility and data quality in the qualitative domain. Due to a longer tradition of conducting non-synchronous quantitative online data collection, researchers have discussed issues related to data quality for use within quantitative research, and developed techniques to address such issues. However, such discussions have not taken place within qualitative research and due to the differences in types of data and theoretical underpinnings, only some of the techniques developed in quantitative research can be appropriately applied in qualitative research. In this paper, we address this knowledge gap by providing an important ‘how to guide’, presenting techniques to help address threats to data quality and integrity in non-synchronous online qualitative research. We start by outlining techniques developed for use in quantitative research that can be appropriately transferred to qualitative paradigms, before proposing techniques to manage challenges faced specifically by non-synchronous online qualitative research. We go on to discuss some of the potential pitfalls which can prevent the implementation of these techniques and how to overcome them. Finally, we urge researchers to be transparent about the techniques they implement to optimise data quality and to adopt a proactive rather than reactive approach to maximising data quality in qualitative research studies.

非同步在线定性方法中参与者完整性和身份的挑战问题
定性数据收集越来越多地发生在网上,数据收集方法往往缺乏研究人员和参与者之间的同步联系,而这种联系存在于更传统的定性数据收集方法(如面对面访谈)中。尽管非同步在线定性数据收集方法有许多好处,但这些方法也对定性领域的参与者资格和数据质量提出了独特的挑战。由于进行非同步定量在线数据收集的传统较长,研究人员讨论了与定量研究中使用的数据质量相关的问题,并开发了解决这些问题的技术。然而,这种讨论并没有在定性研究中进行,由于数据类型和理论基础的差异,只有定量研究中开发的一些技术可以适当地应用于定性研究。在本文中,我们通过提供一个重要的“如何指导”来解决这一知识差距,提出了帮助解决非同步在线定性研究中数据质量和完整性威胁的技术。我们首先概述了用于定量研究的技术,这些技术可以适当地转移到定性范式中,然后提出了管理非同步在线定性研究具体面临的挑战的技术。我们将继续讨论一些可能阻碍这些技术实现的潜在陷阱,以及如何克服它们。最后,我们敦促研究人员对他们用于优化数据质量的技术保持透明,并在定性研究中采用主动而不是被动的方法来最大化数据质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Methods in Psychology (Online)
Methods in Psychology (Online) Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信