Understanding university enterprise collaboration for disaster resilience in South-East Asia

IF 0.9 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Rebeka Catherine Tucker, C. Liyanage, S. Robinson, D. R. Montebon, C. K. Gotangco Gonzales, Joselito C. Olpoc, Liza B. Patacsil, S. Tantanee, Panu Buranajarukorn, Orawan Sirisawat Apichayaku, Rukmal Weerasinghe, Rsanjith Dissanayake
{"title":"Understanding university enterprise collaboration for disaster resilience in South-East Asia","authors":"Rebeka Catherine Tucker, C. Liyanage, S. Robinson, D. R. Montebon, C. K. Gotangco Gonzales, Joselito C. Olpoc, Liza B. Patacsil, S. Tantanee, Panu Buranajarukorn, Orawan Sirisawat Apichayaku, Rukmal Weerasinghe, Rsanjith Dissanayake","doi":"10.1108/ijdrbe-02-2023-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper is part of the ERASMUS+-funded Strengthening University Enterprise Collaboration for Resilient Communities in Asia (SECRA) project. This study aims to map collaborative architecture between partner universities and the public/private sectors to provide a contextualised collaboration framework for disaster resilience (DR) in South-East Asia.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nDocumentary reviews were conducted in partner countries to establish the current context of university enterprise collaborations (UEC) in South-East Asia. A concept-centric approach permitted the synthesis of concepts from each country review, allowing for comparisons between collaborative practices that impact the success of DR collaborations.\n\n\nFindings\nThe review identified that funding, continuity, long-term strategic plans and practical implementation are lacking in partner countries. However, each country demonstrated good practices and identified enablers and barriers that impact DR collaborations.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe synthesis revealed a lack of a practical understanding of real-world barriers. Further research is needed to understand real-world experiences in DR collaborations and to provide insights into barriers, enablers and good practices in DR collaborations. Gaining an “on-the-ground” perspective will provide detailed insights and the feasibility of implementation.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings provide the foundations for developing a heuristic UEC framework that can inform policies and practices for DR in partner countries.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe findings can inform various stakeholder policies and practices and promote the exchange of ideas between stakeholders to enhance DR in South-East Asia.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe results are relevant within the South-East Asian, as governments have intensified the adoption of measures to encourage UEC for DR.\n","PeriodicalId":45983,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdrbe-02-2023-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper is part of the ERASMUS+-funded Strengthening University Enterprise Collaboration for Resilient Communities in Asia (SECRA) project. This study aims to map collaborative architecture between partner universities and the public/private sectors to provide a contextualised collaboration framework for disaster resilience (DR) in South-East Asia. Design/methodology/approach Documentary reviews were conducted in partner countries to establish the current context of university enterprise collaborations (UEC) in South-East Asia. A concept-centric approach permitted the synthesis of concepts from each country review, allowing for comparisons between collaborative practices that impact the success of DR collaborations. Findings The review identified that funding, continuity, long-term strategic plans and practical implementation are lacking in partner countries. However, each country demonstrated good practices and identified enablers and barriers that impact DR collaborations. Research limitations/implications The synthesis revealed a lack of a practical understanding of real-world barriers. Further research is needed to understand real-world experiences in DR collaborations and to provide insights into barriers, enablers and good practices in DR collaborations. Gaining an “on-the-ground” perspective will provide detailed insights and the feasibility of implementation. Practical implications The findings provide the foundations for developing a heuristic UEC framework that can inform policies and practices for DR in partner countries. Social implications The findings can inform various stakeholder policies and practices and promote the exchange of ideas between stakeholders to enhance DR in South-East Asia. Originality/value The results are relevant within the South-East Asian, as governments have intensified the adoption of measures to encourage UEC for DR.
了解东南亚大学与企业合作的抗灾能力
目的本文是ERASMUS+资助的“加强亚洲有韧性社区的大学与企业合作”(SECRA)项目的一部分。本研究旨在绘制合作伙伴大学与公共/私营部门之间的合作架构图,为东南亚的抗灾能力(DR)提供一个情境化的合作框架。设计/方法/方法在合作伙伴国家进行了文献综述,以确定东南亚大学与企业合作的当前背景。以概念为中心的方法可以综合每个国家审查的概念,从而可以比较影响灾难恢复合作成功的合作做法。审查发现,伙伴国家缺乏资金、连续性、长期战略计划和实际执行。然而,每个国家都展示了良好的做法,并确定了影响灾难恢复合作的因素和障碍。研究局限性/含义综合显示,对现实世界的障碍缺乏实际理解。需要进一步的研究来了解DR合作的真实经验,并深入了解DR合作中的障碍、促成因素和良好实践。获得“实地”视角将提供详细的见解和实施的可行性。实际含义研究结果为制定启发式UEC框架奠定了基础,该框架可以为伙伴国家的DR政策和实践提供信息。社会影响研究结果可以为各种利益相关者的政策和实践提供信息,并促进利益相关者之间的思想交流,以提高东南亚的DR。原始性/价值研究结果在东南亚具有相关性,因为各国政府已加强采取措施鼓励UEC进行DR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信