The Effects of Item Dirtiness on Disposal Decisions

IF 2.1 Q3 BUSINESS
Grant E. Donnelly, Christian C. Blanco, Calvin Spanbauer, Sara L. Stienecker
{"title":"The Effects of Item Dirtiness on Disposal Decisions","authors":"Grant E. Donnelly, Christian C. Blanco, Calvin Spanbauer, Sara L. Stienecker","doi":"10.1086/724998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recycling programs have significantly reduced the amount of waste sent to landfills, but recycling contamination rates have risen, reducing the environmental benefit of recycling collection. In this work, we investigate the prevalence of food-stained recyclable material contaminating recycling by evaluating disposal decisions of food-stained paper items. Consumers are more likely to contaminate recycling with food-stained items that have a low (vs. high) degree of dirtiness. We argue that consumers may dispose food-stained paper items into recycling out of a desire to avoid the anticipated negative feelings of not recycling. Consistent with this argument, we demonstrate that consumers with higher environmental values are less influenced by the degree of dirtiness of food-stained paper items and feel more negatively about not recycling food-stained paper items. We further demonstrate that disposal informational campaigns can reduce recycling contamination and increase composting by changing how consumers feel about recycling food-stained paper items.","PeriodicalId":36388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"339 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association for Consumer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Recycling programs have significantly reduced the amount of waste sent to landfills, but recycling contamination rates have risen, reducing the environmental benefit of recycling collection. In this work, we investigate the prevalence of food-stained recyclable material contaminating recycling by evaluating disposal decisions of food-stained paper items. Consumers are more likely to contaminate recycling with food-stained items that have a low (vs. high) degree of dirtiness. We argue that consumers may dispose food-stained paper items into recycling out of a desire to avoid the anticipated negative feelings of not recycling. Consistent with this argument, we demonstrate that consumers with higher environmental values are less influenced by the degree of dirtiness of food-stained paper items and feel more negatively about not recycling food-stained paper items. We further demonstrate that disposal informational campaigns can reduce recycling contamination and increase composting by changing how consumers feel about recycling food-stained paper items.
物品脏污对处置决策的影响
回收计划大大减少了送往垃圾填埋场的废物数量,但回收污染率上升,降低了回收收集的环境效益。在这项工作中,我们通过评估食品染色纸制品的处理决定,调查了食品染色可回收材料污染回收的普遍性。消费者更有可能用低(与高)脏程度的食物污染物品污染回收。我们认为,消费者可能会出于避免预期的不回收负面情绪的愿望,将沾有食物的纸质物品进行回收处理。与这一论点一致的是,我们证明,环境价值较高的消费者较少受到沾有食物的纸制品的脏程度的影响,并且对不回收沾有食品的纸制品感到更消极。我们进一步证明,通过改变消费者对回收沾有食物的纸制品的感受,处理信息活动可以减少回收污染,增加堆肥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信