Aboveground carbon sequestration rate in alpine forests on the eastern Tibetan Plateau: Impacts of future forest management options

IF 3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Yang Lin, Jiangtao Xiao, Yongping Kou, Jiaxing Zu, Xinran Yu, Yuanyuan Li
{"title":"Aboveground carbon sequestration rate in alpine forests on the eastern Tibetan Plateau: Impacts of future forest management options","authors":"Yang Lin, Jiangtao Xiao, Yongping Kou, Jiaxing Zu, Xinran Yu, Yuanyuan Li","doi":"10.1093/jpe/rtad001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Alpine forests in the eastern Tibetan Plateau are important ecological barriers in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. However, due to continuous high-intensity harvesting, a large number of plantings, and the complete harvesting ban measures in recent decades, the forest tree species and age cohorts have become relatively homogenous, and the biodiversity and ecological functions have been reduced.\n To design effective forest management options to optimize forest structure and increase carbon sequestration capacity, Mao County was selected as the study site and six forest management options (harvesting, planting) of different intensities were tested using the LANDIS-II model to simulate and compare the differences in forest aboveground carbon sequestration rate (ACSR) between these options and the current management option over the next 100 years. Our study indicates that (1) the different harvesting and planting intensities significantly changed the ACSR compared to the current management options; (2) different communities responded differently to the management options, with the ACSR differing significantly in cold temperate conifers and temperate conifers but not in broad-leaved trees (p<0.05); and (3) a comprehensive consideration of forest management options at the species, community and landscape levels is necessary. Our results suggested that implementing a longer harvesting and planting interval (20 years) at the study site can maximize forest ACSR. This study provides an important reference for evaluating the ability of forest management options to restore forest ecological functions and increase carbon sequestration capacity and for selecting effective forest management programs in the eastern Tibetan Plateau.","PeriodicalId":50085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Ecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtad001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Alpine forests in the eastern Tibetan Plateau are important ecological barriers in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. However, due to continuous high-intensity harvesting, a large number of plantings, and the complete harvesting ban measures in recent decades, the forest tree species and age cohorts have become relatively homogenous, and the biodiversity and ecological functions have been reduced. To design effective forest management options to optimize forest structure and increase carbon sequestration capacity, Mao County was selected as the study site and six forest management options (harvesting, planting) of different intensities were tested using the LANDIS-II model to simulate and compare the differences in forest aboveground carbon sequestration rate (ACSR) between these options and the current management option over the next 100 years. Our study indicates that (1) the different harvesting and planting intensities significantly changed the ACSR compared to the current management options; (2) different communities responded differently to the management options, with the ACSR differing significantly in cold temperate conifers and temperate conifers but not in broad-leaved trees (p<0.05); and (3) a comprehensive consideration of forest management options at the species, community and landscape levels is necessary. Our results suggested that implementing a longer harvesting and planting interval (20 years) at the study site can maximize forest ACSR. This study provides an important reference for evaluating the ability of forest management options to restore forest ecological functions and increase carbon sequestration capacity and for selecting effective forest management programs in the eastern Tibetan Plateau.
青藏高原东部高山森林地上固碳率:未来森林管理方案的影响
青藏高原东部高寒森林是长江上游重要的生态屏障。然而,近几十年来,由于持续的高强度采伐和大量的种植,以及完整的禁采措施,森林树种和年龄群趋于相对同质化,生物多样性和生态功能降低。为了设计有效的森林经营方案,优化森林结构,增加固碳能力,以毛县为研究点,采用LANDIS-II模型对6种不同强度的森林经营方案(采伐、种植)进行试验,模拟并比较未来100年这些方案与当前经营方案的森林地上碳固存率(ACSR)差异。研究表明:(1)与现有管理方案相比,不同的收获和种植强度显著改变了ACSR;(2)不同群落对管理方案的响应不同,寒温带针叶树和温带针叶树的ACSR差异显著,阔叶树的ACSR差异不显著(p<0.05);(3)有必要在物种、群落和景观水平上综合考虑森林管理方案。研究结果表明,延长采伐间隔期(20年)可以最大限度地提高森林ACSR。本研究为评价青藏高原东部森林经营方案恢复森林生态功能和增加固碳能力的能力以及选择有效的森林经营方案提供了重要参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Plant Ecology
Journal of Plant Ecology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
18.50%
发文量
134
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Plant Ecology (JPE) serves as an important medium for ecologists to present research findings and discuss challenging issues in the broad field of plants and their interactions with biotic and abiotic environment. The JPE will cover all aspects of plant ecology, including plant ecophysiology, population ecology, community ecology, ecosystem ecology and landscape ecology as well as conservation ecology, evolutionary ecology, and theoretical ecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信