Diagnostic efficacy cell block method of transthoracic fine needle aspiration in diagnosis of lung cancer

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Y. Sutanto, N. Santi, B. Wasita, A. Rima, Hendra Kurniawan
{"title":"Diagnostic efficacy cell block method of transthoracic fine needle aspiration in diagnosis of lung cancer","authors":"Y. Sutanto, N. Santi, B. Wasita, A. Rima, Hendra Kurniawan","doi":"10.18051/univmed.2021.v40.133-140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundLung cancer is still the main cause of cancer deaths. The high lung cancer mortality rate is caused by a diagnosis factor or therapy selection. The cell block cytology technique using fine needle aspiration (FNA) samples can provide immunocytochemical material that plays an important role in the differential diagnosis of lung cancer subtypes and in determining immunotherapy administration. This study aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of transthoracic FNA (TTFNA) cell block cytology in comparison with bronchial washing smears and TTFNA smears in diagnosing lung cancer.\nMethodsThis was a cross-sectional diagnostic study involving 26 subjects. All subjects had undergone bronchial washing and CT scan-guided fine needle aspiration followed by cell block preparation. Both direct FNA smears and cell blocks are useful in the diagnostic work-up of patients. Comparative statistical analysis of TTFNA cell block versus bronchial washing smear and TTFNA smear cytology was carried out using the McNemar test.\nResultsLung cancer was found in 15 patients (57.7%) using the TTFNA cell block technique. The sensitivity and specificity of the TTFNA cell block technique were 85.7% and 75%, respectively. There was no difference in the positivity value between TTFNA cell block technique of bronchial wash smear technique, and TTFNA smear on lung cancer diagnosis (p>0.05).\nConclusionsTransthoracic fine-needle aspiration in combination with the cell block technique has good sensitivity and specificity. The TTFNA can be used for immunocytochemical examinations in lung cancer diagnosis and therapy. This approach is valuable for providing individualized treatment and prognostic evaluations.","PeriodicalId":42578,"journal":{"name":"Universa Medicina","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universa Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18051/univmed.2021.v40.133-140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundLung cancer is still the main cause of cancer deaths. The high lung cancer mortality rate is caused by a diagnosis factor or therapy selection. The cell block cytology technique using fine needle aspiration (FNA) samples can provide immunocytochemical material that plays an important role in the differential diagnosis of lung cancer subtypes and in determining immunotherapy administration. This study aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of transthoracic FNA (TTFNA) cell block cytology in comparison with bronchial washing smears and TTFNA smears in diagnosing lung cancer. MethodsThis was a cross-sectional diagnostic study involving 26 subjects. All subjects had undergone bronchial washing and CT scan-guided fine needle aspiration followed by cell block preparation. Both direct FNA smears and cell blocks are useful in the diagnostic work-up of patients. Comparative statistical analysis of TTFNA cell block versus bronchial washing smear and TTFNA smear cytology was carried out using the McNemar test. ResultsLung cancer was found in 15 patients (57.7%) using the TTFNA cell block technique. The sensitivity and specificity of the TTFNA cell block technique were 85.7% and 75%, respectively. There was no difference in the positivity value between TTFNA cell block technique of bronchial wash smear technique, and TTFNA smear on lung cancer diagnosis (p>0.05). ConclusionsTransthoracic fine-needle aspiration in combination with the cell block technique has good sensitivity and specificity. The TTFNA can be used for immunocytochemical examinations in lung cancer diagnosis and therapy. This approach is valuable for providing individualized treatment and prognostic evaluations.
经胸细针穿刺细胞阻滞法诊断肺癌的临床疗效
背景肺癌仍然是癌症死亡的主要原因。肺癌的高死亡率是由诊断因素或治疗选择引起的。使用细针抽吸(FNA)样本的细胞阻断细胞学技术可以提供免疫细胞化学材料,在肺癌亚型的鉴别诊断和确定免疫治疗给药方面发挥重要作用。本研究旨在探讨经胸FNA (TTFNA)细胞阻滞细胞学与支气管洗涤涂片和TTFNA涂片诊断肺癌的敏感性和特异性。方法26例患者的横断面诊断研究。所有受试者均行支气管清洗和CT引导下细针抽吸,并行细胞阻滞制备。直接FNA涂片和细胞阻滞在患者的诊断检查中都很有用。采用McNemar试验对TTFNA细胞阻滞与支气管洗涤涂片和TTFNA涂片细胞学进行比较统计分析。结果TTFNA细胞阻断技术检出肺癌15例(57.7%)。TTFNA细胞阻断技术的敏感性和特异性分别为85.7%和75%。TTFNA细胞阻断技术支气管冲洗涂片技术与TTFNA涂片在肺癌诊断上的阳性率差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论经胸细针穿刺联合细胞阻滞技术具有良好的敏感性和特异性。TTFNA可用于肺癌诊断和治疗的免疫细胞化学检查。这种方法对于提供个体化治疗和预后评估是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Universa Medicina
Universa Medicina MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信