Cross-functional integration skills: Are business schools delivering what organizations need?

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Derrick E. D'Souza, Danuse Bement, Kenneth Cory
{"title":"Cross-functional integration skills: Are business schools delivering what organizations need?","authors":"Derrick E. D'Souza,&nbsp;Danuse Bement,&nbsp;Kenneth Cory","doi":"10.1111/dsji.12262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Practitioner surveys suggest that despite well-intentioned efforts, undergraduate business programs could better equip students with “soft skills.” This research study focuses on the soft skills associated with cross-functional integration (CFI), where skill gaps are believed to exist but have not been confirmed. As the first study to specifically characterize and measure CFI skills, we argue that even in the best-case scenario, a small CFI-skills gap could persist, and that the primary goal of business programs is to minimize, not eliminate, the gap. We assert that an instrument that measures CFI skills on three dimensions (cross-functional collaboration, cross-functional coordination, and cross-functional communication) provides a critical starting point in the identification and management of the CFI skills gap. We adapt and validate such an instrument, test it with a sample of 160 business students and 160 hiring managers, and find statistically significant gaps at the construct and dimensional level. However, the magnitude of the gaps is not large, suggesting that business schools may be doing a good job of managing the CFI skills gap. Our assessment instrument is a valuable tool for companies that wish to diagnose and address CFI skills challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":46210,"journal":{"name":"Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education","volume":"20 3","pages":"117-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dsji.12262","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dsji.12262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Practitioner surveys suggest that despite well-intentioned efforts, undergraduate business programs could better equip students with “soft skills.” This research study focuses on the soft skills associated with cross-functional integration (CFI), where skill gaps are believed to exist but have not been confirmed. As the first study to specifically characterize and measure CFI skills, we argue that even in the best-case scenario, a small CFI-skills gap could persist, and that the primary goal of business programs is to minimize, not eliminate, the gap. We assert that an instrument that measures CFI skills on three dimensions (cross-functional collaboration, cross-functional coordination, and cross-functional communication) provides a critical starting point in the identification and management of the CFI skills gap. We adapt and validate such an instrument, test it with a sample of 160 business students and 160 hiring managers, and find statistically significant gaps at the construct and dimensional level. However, the magnitude of the gaps is not large, suggesting that business schools may be doing a good job of managing the CFI skills gap. Our assessment instrument is a valuable tool for companies that wish to diagnose and address CFI skills challenges.

Abstract Image

跨职能整合技能:商学院提供的是组织所需要的吗?
从业人员调查显示,尽管初衷是好的,本科商业课程还是可以更好地让学生掌握“软技能”。本研究的重点是与跨职能整合(CFI)相关的软技能,技能差距被认为存在,但尚未得到证实。作为第一个专门描述和衡量CFI技能的研究,我们认为,即使在最好的情况下,一个小的CFI技能差距也可能持续存在,商业项目的主要目标是最小化,而不是消除差距。我们断言,从三个维度(跨职能协作、跨职能协调和跨职能沟通)衡量CFI技能的工具,为识别和管理CFI技能差距提供了一个关键的起点。我们对这一工具进行了调整和验证,并以160名商学院学生和160名招聘经理为样本进行了测试,发现在结构和维度层面上存在统计学上的显著差异。然而,差距的幅度并不大,这表明商学院在管理CFI技能差距方面可能做得不错。对于希望诊断和解决CFI技能挑战的公司来说,我们的评估工具是一个有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education
Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
36.80%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信