The Battle of Peta (1822): when the Philhellenes fought like the Greek irregulars

IF 0.3 4区社会学 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1017/byz.2021.5

Nikos Tompros, Nikos Kanellopoulos

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The most direct and definite expression of Philhellenism during the Greek War of Independence (1821–9) was military action by European volunteers, generally officers, on the side of the revolutionaries. This article discusses the Philhellenes’ military action at the Battle of Peta in 1822, as recorded in the diary of one of the few survivors, the physician Johann-Daniel Elster. Elster's information is compared with other Greek and European sources about the battle and the conditions of the campaign in Epirus and the circumstances that led to the Philhellenes’ defeat re-evaluated.

查看原文本刊更多论文

佩塔战役(1822年):菲希腊人像希腊非正规军一样战斗

在希腊独立战争（1821–9）期间，希腊主义最直接、最明确的表现是欧洲志愿者，通常是军官，站在革命者一边的军事行动。这篇文章讨论了费城人在1822年佩塔战役中的军事行动，正如为数不多的幸存者之一、医生约翰·丹尼尔·埃尔斯特的日记中所记录的那样。埃尔斯特的信息与其他希腊和欧洲消息来源进行了比较，了解伊庇鲁斯战役的情况，以及导致菲洛人战败的情况。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies is an internationally recognised, peer-reviewed journal and one of the leading publications in its field. It is viewed as an important outlet for current research. Published twice a year in spring and autumn, its remit has always been to facilitate the publication of high-quality research and discussion in all aspects of Byzantine and Modern Greek scholarship, whether historical, literary or social-anthropological. It welcomes research, criticism, contributions on theory and method in the form of articles, critical studies and short notes.

文献相关原料

公司名称	产品信息	采购帮参考价格