Effectiveness of Different Algorithms and Cut-off Value in Preeclampsia First Trimester Screening

IF 3.2 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Piotr Tousty, B. Czuba, D. Borowski, Magda Fraszczyk-Tousty, Sylwia Dzidek, E. Kwiatkowska, A. Cymbaluk-Płoska, A. Torbé, S. Kwiatkowski
{"title":"Effectiveness of Different Algorithms and Cut-off Value in Preeclampsia First Trimester Screening","authors":"Piotr Tousty, B. Czuba, D. Borowski, Magda Fraszczyk-Tousty, Sylwia Dzidek, E. Kwiatkowska, A. Cymbaluk-Płoska, A. Torbé, S. Kwiatkowski","doi":"10.1155/2022/6414857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Results For the cut-off point >1 : 150, 86 women at an increased risk of eo-PE using algorithm 1 were identified. Of these 86 patients, 83 (96%) were identified using algorithm 2, 62 (72%) using algorithm 3, and 60 (69%) using algorithm 4. In addition, it was demonstrated that between 21% and 29% of women at a low risk of eo-PE could be given acetylsalicylic acid if a screening test was used that did not account for PlGF. Conclusions In order to provide the highest level of health care to pregnant women, it is extremely important that full screening for eo-PE should be ensured. The cheapest algorithm based only on MAP and UtPI resulted in our patients being unnecessarily exposed to complications.","PeriodicalId":47062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pregnancy","volume":"2022 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pregnancy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6414857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Results For the cut-off point >1 : 150, 86 women at an increased risk of eo-PE using algorithm 1 were identified. Of these 86 patients, 83 (96%) were identified using algorithm 2, 62 (72%) using algorithm 3, and 60 (69%) using algorithm 4. In addition, it was demonstrated that between 21% and 29% of women at a low risk of eo-PE could be given acetylsalicylic acid if a screening test was used that did not account for PlGF. Conclusions In order to provide the highest level of health care to pregnant women, it is extremely important that full screening for eo-PE should be ensured. The cheapest algorithm based only on MAP and UtPI resulted in our patients being unnecessarily exposed to complications.
不同算法和截断值在子痫前期筛查中的有效性
结果对于截断点bb1:15 0,使用算法1确定了86名eo-PE风险增加的女性。在这86例患者中,83例(96%)采用算法2,62例(72%)采用算法3,60例(69%)采用算法4。此外,研究表明,如果使用不考虑PlGF的筛查试验,21%至29%的低风险eo-PE妇女可以给予乙酰水杨酸。结论为了向孕妇提供最高水平的医疗保健,确保eo-PE的全面筛查至关重要。仅基于MAP和UtPI的最便宜的算法导致我们的患者不必要地暴露于并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pregnancy
Journal of Pregnancy OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pregnancy is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on breastfeeding, labor, maternal health and the biomedical aspects of pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信