Technological differentiation in the development of the Ural macroregion’s subjects

M. Evseeva
{"title":"Technological differentiation in the development of the Ural macroregion’s subjects","authors":"M. Evseeva","doi":"10.29141/2658-5081-2020-21-3-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the local level, regions are the entities that have to grapple with the problem of Russia’s technological breakthrough directly. The paper aims to uncover the reasons behind the differences in technological development of the subjects of the Ural macroregion. The econom ics of complexity and new Schumpeterian theory of economic growth constitute the methodo logical basis of the research. The author applies economic mathematical methods of analysis, as well as analytical tools of the ecosystem approach to examine the sample of 3,436 manufactur ing companies from the seven subjects of the Ural macroregion in the period of 2007–2019. The researcher specifies separate technologies by disagregating industries using All-Russian Classification of Economic Activities (OKVED-2). Companies are divided into three groups depending on the type of the main implemented technology: system, component or basic. The findings reveal that leading regions feature high degree of technological complexity determined on the basis of technological diversity and localisation of the system integrator companies. Ad ditionally, leaders significantly outperform other regions in total factor productivity of compa nies employing different groups of technologies. The research demonstrates that the presence of a system technology in a region stimulates the development of a family of related compo nent technologies, which may be located not only in the region of operation, but in also in the neighboring less technologically developed regions. This gives rise to the assumption that in the macroregion a separate technological ecosystem may form. The empirical data show that the domination of separate technologies in a region may slow down the technological development. The results of the research can be helpful while devising the plans for technological and spatial development of territories.","PeriodicalId":33954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of New Economy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of New Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29141/2658-5081-2020-21-3-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

At the local level, regions are the entities that have to grapple with the problem of Russia’s technological breakthrough directly. The paper aims to uncover the reasons behind the differences in technological development of the subjects of the Ural macroregion. The econom ics of complexity and new Schumpeterian theory of economic growth constitute the methodo logical basis of the research. The author applies economic mathematical methods of analysis, as well as analytical tools of the ecosystem approach to examine the sample of 3,436 manufactur ing companies from the seven subjects of the Ural macroregion in the period of 2007–2019. The researcher specifies separate technologies by disagregating industries using All-Russian Classification of Economic Activities (OKVED-2). Companies are divided into three groups depending on the type of the main implemented technology: system, component or basic. The findings reveal that leading regions feature high degree of technological complexity determined on the basis of technological diversity and localisation of the system integrator companies. Ad ditionally, leaders significantly outperform other regions in total factor productivity of compa nies employing different groups of technologies. The research demonstrates that the presence of a system technology in a region stimulates the development of a family of related compo nent technologies, which may be located not only in the region of operation, but in also in the neighboring less technologically developed regions. This gives rise to the assumption that in the macroregion a separate technological ecosystem may form. The empirical data show that the domination of separate technologies in a region may slow down the technological development. The results of the research can be helpful while devising the plans for technological and spatial development of territories.
乌拉尔大区主体发展中的技术分化
在地方一级,地区是必须直接解决俄罗斯技术突破问题的实体。本文旨在揭示乌拉尔大区主体技术发展差异背后的原因。复杂性经济学和新熊彼特经济增长理论构成了研究的方法和逻辑基础。作者应用经济数学分析方法以及生态系统方法的分析工具,对2007年至2019年期间乌拉尔大区七个主体的3436家制造企业的样本进行了检验。研究人员使用全俄罗斯经济活动分类法(OKVED-2)通过取消行业隔离来指定单独的技术。根据主要实现技术的类型,公司分为三组:系统、组件或基本技术。研究结果表明,领先地区具有高度的技术复杂性,这是基于系统集成商公司的技术多样性和本地化决定的。有条件的是,领导者在使用不同技术组的公司的全要素生产率方面显著优于其他地区。研究表明,系统技术在一个地区的存在会刺激一系列相关组件技术的发展,这些组件技术不仅可能位于运营地区,也可能位于邻近的技术欠发达地区。这就产生了一种假设,即在宏观区域内可能会形成一个单独的技术生态系统。经验数据表明,单独的技术在一个区域内的主导地位可能会减缓技术发展。研究结果有助于制定领土的技术和空间发展计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信