Colombian People’s Willingness to Forgive Offenses against Women Perpetrated during the Armed Conflict

IF 1.1 4区心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia Pub Date : 2019-12-15 DOI:10.14349/rlp.2019.v51.n3.9

Claudia Pineda-Marín, Bogotá Colombia Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, María Teresa Muñoz Sastre, Diana Gutiérrez Villamarín, M. CarolinaEspitia, E. Mullet

{"title":"Colombian People’s Willingness to Forgive Offenses against Women Perpetrated during the Armed Conflict","authors":"Claudia Pineda-Marín, Bogotá Colombia Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, María Teresa Muñoz Sastre, Diana Gutiérrez Villamarín, M. CarolinaEspitia, E. Mullet","doi":"10.14349/rlp.2019.v51.n3.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen Este estudio examino la disposicion a perdonar de personas comunes colombianas frente a los crimenes en contra de las mujeres, durante el contexto del conflicto armado colombiano. Tambien estudio las relaciones entre la disposicion a perdonar y las actitudes frente al proceso de paz. Se observo que la mayoria de los participantes (61%) tienen muy baja disposicion a perdonar. Entre los participantes que no fueron completamente hostiles, se observaron tres posiciones: un 18% estaba dispuesto a perdonar en funcion del tipo de crimen, para el 8% su disposicion a perdonar dependia de la conducta de disculpas por parte del ofensor, y para el 8% el perdon fue incondicional. Los participantes que no rechazaban la posibilidad de perdonar, expresaron de manera significativa perspectivas mas positivas frente al actual proceso de paz que los aquellos quienes expresaron rechazo. EnglishAbstract We examined the Colombian people's positions on forgiving perpetrators of offenses against women during the armed conflict, and the relationship between willingness to forgive and attitudes towards the peace process. The majority of participants (61%) were quite unwilling to forgive. Among participants who were not completely hostile, three positions were found. For 18%, forgiving mainly depended on the type of crime, for 8%, it depended on the subsequent apologetic behaviour, and for 8%, forgiving was unconditional. Participants who did not reject the possibility of forgiveness expressed significantly more positive views regarding the current peace process than participants who expressed rejection.","PeriodicalId":46559,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2019.v51.n3.9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Abstract

espanolResumen Este estudio examino la disposicion a perdonar de personas comunes colombianas frente a los crimenes en contra de las mujeres, durante el contexto del conflicto armado colombiano. Tambien estudio las relaciones entre la disposicion a perdonar y las actitudes frente al proceso de paz. Se observo que la mayoria de los participantes (61%) tienen muy baja disposicion a perdonar. Entre los participantes que no fueron completamente hostiles, se observaron tres posiciones: un 18% estaba dispuesto a perdonar en funcion del tipo de crimen, para el 8% su disposicion a perdonar dependia de la conducta de disculpas por parte del ofensor, y para el 8% el perdon fue incondicional. Los participantes que no rechazaban la posibilidad de perdonar, expresaron de manera significativa perspectivas mas positivas frente al actual proceso de paz que los aquellos quienes expresaron rechazo. EnglishAbstract We examined the Colombian people's positions on forgiving perpetrators of offenses against women during the armed conflict, and the relationship between willingness to forgive and attitudes towards the peace process. The majority of participants (61%) were quite unwilling to forgive. Among participants who were not completely hostile, three positions were found. For 18%, forgiving mainly depended on the type of crime, for 8%, it depended on the subsequent apologetic behaviour, and for 8%, forgiving was unconditional. Participants who did not reject the possibility of forgiveness expressed significantly more positive views regarding the current peace process than participants who expressed rejection.

查看原文本刊更多论文

哥伦比亚人民愿意原谅武装冲突期间对妇女犯下的罪行

西班牙总结这项研究审查了哥伦比亚普通人在哥伦比亚武装冲突期间是否愿意原谅对妇女的犯罪。它还研究了宽恕意愿与对和平进程的态度之间的关系。值得注意的是，大多数参与者（61%）的宽恕意愿非常低。在不完全敌对的参与者中，观察到三种立场：18%的人愿意根据罪行的类型原谅，8%的人愿意原谅取决于罪犯的道歉行为，8%的人无条件原谅。不拒绝原谅的参与者比那些表示拒绝的参与者对当前和平进程表达了更积极的观点。我们审查了哥伦比亚人民对在武装冲突期间原谅侵害妇女行为人的立场，以及宽恕意愿与对和平进程的态度之间的关系。大多数参与者（61%）非常不愿意原谅。在不完全敌对的参与者中，发现了三个位置。18%的人认为宽恕主要取决于犯罪类型，8%的人认为宽恕取决于随后的道歉行为，8%的人认为宽恕是无条件的。不拒绝宽恕可能性的与会者对目前的和平进程表示了比拒绝的与会者更积极的看法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Revista latinoamericana de Psicología (RLP) is a four month publication from Konrad Lorenz Fundación Universitaria. The RLP evaluates works that belong to one of the following categories: original papers (with empiric and new information) of many psychology fields (regardless of the methodology used) or qualitative/quantitative systematic reviews. Eventually it will be interested on works’ revision related to the development psychology tools or softwares, original methodology papers and researches which evaluate psychology from scientometry. The RLP is not interested in publishing non-systematic reviews or states of the art, case studies, protocols studies, hypothesis or papers proposals, letters, commentaries or essays, opinions articles, politics documents nor other sort of secondary literature. Traditionally, there have been monographics, books’ reviews and “others” published in “Mundo de la Psicología”, nevertheless these modalities will not be considered.