Biochar-mediated remediation impacts on nitrogen cycling bacteria and ammonia monooxygenase activity in crude oil polluted soil

Anwuli U. Osadebe, Ibiso W. Davis, C. Ogugbue, G. C. Okpokwasili
{"title":"Biochar-mediated remediation impacts on nitrogen cycling bacteria and ammonia monooxygenase activity in crude oil polluted soil","authors":"Anwuli U. Osadebe, Ibiso W. Davis, C. Ogugbue, G. C. Okpokwasili","doi":"10.4314/jfas.1217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study adopted an ecosystem services approach to pollution management by investigating the impact of biochar-mediated remediation on soil nitrogen, abundance of nitrogen cycling bacteria and the activity of ammonia monooxygenase (AMO) enzyme in petroleum-polluted soil using two biochar types applied at two treatment levels with monitoring over 15 weeks. The corn cob-derived biochar (CDB), generally, had a stronger restorative effect on soil ammonium nitrogen, nitrate and total organic nitrogen concentrations than the bone-derived biochar (BDB). Both biochar types had a more robust impact on restoration of Nitrosomonas, Nitrobacter and Azotobacter abundance (with the re-establishment of pre-pollution levels) than on Rhizobium and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochar amendment restored the activity of AMO enzyme in the soil by week 15. The CDB (72.4% – 73.7%) showed more effective total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) elimination capacity than the BDB (51.1% – 57.7%). Biochar amendments exhibited great potential for restoration of nitrogen cycling while facilitating remediation of petroleum-polluted soils.","PeriodicalId":15885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.1217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study adopted an ecosystem services approach to pollution management by investigating the impact of biochar-mediated remediation on soil nitrogen, abundance of nitrogen cycling bacteria and the activity of ammonia monooxygenase (AMO) enzyme in petroleum-polluted soil using two biochar types applied at two treatment levels with monitoring over 15 weeks. The corn cob-derived biochar (CDB), generally, had a stronger restorative effect on soil ammonium nitrogen, nitrate and total organic nitrogen concentrations than the bone-derived biochar (BDB). Both biochar types had a more robust impact on restoration of Nitrosomonas, Nitrobacter and Azotobacter abundance (with the re-establishment of pre-pollution levels) than on Rhizobium and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochar amendment restored the activity of AMO enzyme in the soil by week 15. The CDB (72.4% – 73.7%) showed more effective total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) elimination capacity than the BDB (51.1% – 57.7%). Biochar amendments exhibited great potential for restoration of nitrogen cycling while facilitating remediation of petroleum-polluted soils.
原油污染土壤中生物炭修复对氮循环细菌和氨单加氧酶活性的影响
本研究采用生态系统服务方法对石油污染土壤进行污染管理,研究了两种生物炭在两个处理水平下对土壤氮、氮循环细菌丰度和氨单加氧酶(AMO)酶活性的影响。总体而言,玉米芯生物炭对土壤铵态氮、硝态氮和总有机氮的恢复作用强于骨源生物炭。与根瘤菌和铜绿假单胞菌相比,这两种生物炭类型对亚硝化单胞菌、硝化杆菌和固氮细菌丰度的恢复(恢复到污染前水平)的影响更强。在第15周,生物炭处理恢复了土壤中AMO酶的活性。CDB(72.4% ~ 73.7%)比BDB(51.1% ~ 57.7%)更能有效去除总石油烃(TPH)。生物炭在修复石油污染土壤的同时,也显示出巨大的氮循环修复潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信