What difference does it make?

Q2 Arts and Humanities
G. Hessel, R. Vanderplank
{"title":"What difference does it make?","authors":"G. Hessel, R. Vanderplank","doi":"10.1075/SAR.16020.HES","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Direct effects of participation in study abroad on linguistic proficiency have been notoriously difficult to differentiate from\n mere participant, time and study effects. This study examines English proficiency gains among 136 advanced-level German university\n students who applied for an ERASMUS exchange and either studied at a British university or continued to study at home.\n Participants completed C-tests of English language proficiency and comprehensive questionnaires at baseline, after three and nine\n months. After the first three months, those studying abroad had made significantly higher proficiency gains than the ERASMUS\n applicants who continued to study at home. During the subsequent six months, linguistic progress among the study abroad\n participants slowed and between-group differences were no longer significant. The results further substantiate hypotheses on\n significant linguistic benefits of participation in study abroad for advanced L2 learners, while also highlighting the need to\n facilitate sustained linguistic progress among exchange students, particularly during more extended stays.","PeriodicalId":36825,"journal":{"name":"Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/SAR.16020.HES","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Direct effects of participation in study abroad on linguistic proficiency have been notoriously difficult to differentiate from mere participant, time and study effects. This study examines English proficiency gains among 136 advanced-level German university students who applied for an ERASMUS exchange and either studied at a British university or continued to study at home. Participants completed C-tests of English language proficiency and comprehensive questionnaires at baseline, after three and nine months. After the first three months, those studying abroad had made significantly higher proficiency gains than the ERASMUS applicants who continued to study at home. During the subsequent six months, linguistic progress among the study abroad participants slowed and between-group differences were no longer significant. The results further substantiate hypotheses on significant linguistic benefits of participation in study abroad for advanced L2 learners, while also highlighting the need to facilitate sustained linguistic progress among exchange students, particularly during more extended stays.
有什么区别吗?
众所周知,参与留学对语言水平的直接影响很难与单纯的参与者、时间和学习影响区分开来。这项研究调查了136名申请ERASMUS交换并在英国大学学习或继续在家学习的高级德国大学生的英语水平提高情况。参与者在三个月和九个月后完成了英语水平的C测试和综合问卷调查。在最初的三个月后,那些在国外学习的人取得了比继续在国内学习的ERASMUS申请人高得多的熟练程度。在随后的六个月里,出国留学参与者的语言进步放缓,组间差异不再显著。研究结果进一步证实了关于高级二语学习者参与海外学习的显著语言益处的假设,同时也强调了促进交换生持续语言进步的必要性,特别是在长期逗留期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信