Novel hollow fiber sandwich composite post system: mechanical characteristics.

Q3 Medicine
Luca Bovolato, R. Tonini, Giulia Boschi, Giovanni Cavalli, S. Salgarello
{"title":"Novel hollow fiber sandwich composite post system: mechanical characteristics.","authors":"Luca Bovolato, R. Tonini, Giulia Boschi, Giovanni Cavalli, S. Salgarello","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04235-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThere is currently no consensus on the optimal post system to provide effective long-term results. We used an engineering approach to investigate the mechanical properties of a sandwich hollow carbon fiber post in synergy with a new bonding technique.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe studied two systems - a sandwich fiber hollow post (Techole®, Isasan, Como, Italy) composed of carbon fiber incorporated in a Dpp-MOR resin mix and a traditional non-hollow post (Tech 2000®, Isasan, Como, Italy). A bi-component composite (Clearfil Core®, Kuraray, New York, NY, USA) (2.2 gcm3, 12.3 GPa) and a dual cure composite with lower density and modulus of elasticity (Clearfil DC Core®, Kuraray, New York, NY, USA) (2.0 gcm3, 10.0 GPa) were also used into hollow posts. Results from three-point bending test (n=81), compression test (n=78) and cut test (n=81) were achieved.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn the three-point bending test there were significant differences in flexibility/bending when sandwich fiber hollow posts were filled with composite of different modulus of elasticity. Hollow sandwich posts showed also significant (p=0,000) better resistance to compression and cutting than solid posts, independently of the type of composite. Moreover, hollow posts filled plus composite with a modulus of elasticity of 12.3 GPa showed significant (p=0,000) improved resistance parameters rather than hollow posts filled with a composite of 10.0 GPa.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe study confirms the favorable mechanical properties of the hollow sandwich fiber post system (Techole®) and the synergistic efficacy when used in combination with the composite Clearfil DC Core® (10.0 GPa) and, especially, Clearfil Core® (12.3 GPa).","PeriodicalId":18742,"journal":{"name":"Minerva stomatologica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva stomatologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04235-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND There is currently no consensus on the optimal post system to provide effective long-term results. We used an engineering approach to investigate the mechanical properties of a sandwich hollow carbon fiber post in synergy with a new bonding technique. METHODS We studied two systems - a sandwich fiber hollow post (Techole®, Isasan, Como, Italy) composed of carbon fiber incorporated in a Dpp-MOR resin mix and a traditional non-hollow post (Tech 2000®, Isasan, Como, Italy). A bi-component composite (Clearfil Core®, Kuraray, New York, NY, USA) (2.2 gcm3, 12.3 GPa) and a dual cure composite with lower density and modulus of elasticity (Clearfil DC Core®, Kuraray, New York, NY, USA) (2.0 gcm3, 10.0 GPa) were also used into hollow posts. Results from three-point bending test (n=81), compression test (n=78) and cut test (n=81) were achieved. RESULTS In the three-point bending test there were significant differences in flexibility/bending when sandwich fiber hollow posts were filled with composite of different modulus of elasticity. Hollow sandwich posts showed also significant (p=0,000) better resistance to compression and cutting than solid posts, independently of the type of composite. Moreover, hollow posts filled plus composite with a modulus of elasticity of 12.3 GPa showed significant (p=0,000) improved resistance parameters rather than hollow posts filled with a composite of 10.0 GPa. CONCLUSIONS The study confirms the favorable mechanical properties of the hollow sandwich fiber post system (Techole®) and the synergistic efficacy when used in combination with the composite Clearfil DC Core® (10.0 GPa) and, especially, Clearfil Core® (12.3 GPa).
新型中空纤维夹层复合材料立柱系统:力学特性。
背景目前还没有就提供有效长期结果的最佳职位制度达成共识。我们采用工程方法研究了夹层中空碳纤维桩的力学性能,并与一种新的粘结技术相结合。方法我们研究了两个系统——由掺入Dpp-MOR树脂混合物中的碳纤维组成的夹层纤维空心柱(Techole®,Isasan,Como,Italy)和传统的非空心柱(Tech 2000®,Isasan,Como)。双组分复合材料(Clearfil Core®,Kuraray,New York,NY,USA)(2.2立方厘米3,12.3 GPa)和具有较低密度和弹性模量的双固化复合材料(Clearfil DC Core®,Kuaray,NewYork,Y.,USA。获得了三点弯曲试验(n=81)、压缩试验(n=78)和切割试验(n=82)的结果。结果在三点弯曲试验中,不同弹性模量的复合材料填充夹层纤维空心柱的柔性/弯曲性能存在显著差异。与复合材料的类型无关,空心夹芯柱也显示出比实心柱更好的抗压和抗切割性能(p=0.000)。此外填充的空心桩加上弹性模量为12.3GPa的复合材料比填充10.0GPa的空心桩显示出显著(p=0.000)的阻力参数改善。结论该研究证实了中空夹层纤维桩系统(Techole®)的良好机械性能以及与复合材料Clearfil结合使用时的协同功效DC Core®(10.0 GPa),尤其是Clearfil Core®(12.3 GPa)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva stomatologica
Minerva stomatologica DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Stomatologica publishes scientific papers on dentistry and maxillo-facial surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信