The Reviews on Sustainable and Responsible Investment (SRIs) Practices According to Maqasid Shariah and Maslahah Perspectives

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS
Etikonomi Pub Date : 2021-11-02 DOI:10.15408/etk.v20i2.18053
Muhammad Zarunnaim HAJI WAHAB, A. Naim
{"title":"The Reviews on Sustainable and Responsible Investment (SRIs) Practices According to Maqasid Shariah and Maslahah Perspectives","authors":"Muhammad Zarunnaim HAJI WAHAB, A. Naim","doi":"10.15408/etk.v20i2.18053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aims to explore SRIs practices based on Maqasid Shariah and Maslahah's points of view. A qualitative method via content analysis document was advocated to address the link between all concepts. The analysis revealed that SRIs, Maqasid Shariah and Maslahah share similar aims and goals to promote better environmental practices and social and governance issues. Thus, the paper concludes that the concept of SRIs does not contradict Maqasid Shariah and Maslahah in Islamic perspectives. However, a few criteria in the Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) concept that govern the SRIs practices like promoting human rights, freedom of expression, and censorship need further clarification to align with Shariah principles. The paper can enlighten the reader, especially in terms of the capabilities of SRIs practices (which is from West philosophy) to suit Maqasid Shariah and Maslahah in Islamic perspectives.JEL Classification: G2, G4, I13, N2How to Cite:Wahab, M. Z. H., & Naim, A. M. (2021). The Reviews on Sustainable and Responsible Investment (SRIs) Practices According to Maqasid Shariah and Maslahah Perspectives. Etikonomi, 20(2), xx – xx. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v20i2.18053.","PeriodicalId":41552,"journal":{"name":"Etikonomi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etikonomi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v20i2.18053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The present study aims to explore SRIs practices based on Maqasid Shariah and Maslahah's points of view. A qualitative method via content analysis document was advocated to address the link between all concepts. The analysis revealed that SRIs, Maqasid Shariah and Maslahah share similar aims and goals to promote better environmental practices and social and governance issues. Thus, the paper concludes that the concept of SRIs does not contradict Maqasid Shariah and Maslahah in Islamic perspectives. However, a few criteria in the Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) concept that govern the SRIs practices like promoting human rights, freedom of expression, and censorship need further clarification to align with Shariah principles. The paper can enlighten the reader, especially in terms of the capabilities of SRIs practices (which is from West philosophy) to suit Maqasid Shariah and Maslahah in Islamic perspectives.JEL Classification: G2, G4, I13, N2How to Cite:Wahab, M. Z. H., & Naim, A. M. (2021). The Reviews on Sustainable and Responsible Investment (SRIs) Practices According to Maqasid Shariah and Maslahah Perspectives. Etikonomi, 20(2), xx – xx. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v20i2.18053.
基于Maqasid Shariah和Maslahah视角的可持续和负责任投资(SRIs)实践综述
本研究旨在探讨基于Maqasid Shariah和Maslahah观点的SRI实践。提倡通过内容分析文件的定性方法来解决所有概念之间的联系。分析显示,SRI、Maqasid Shariah和Maslahah在促进更好的环境实践以及社会和治理问题方面有着相似的目标和目的。因此,本文得出的结论是,SRIs的概念与伊斯兰视角中的Maqasid Shariah和Maslahah并不矛盾。然而,环境、社会和治理(ESG)概念中管理SRI实践的一些标准,如促进人权、言论自由和审查,需要进一步澄清,以符合伊斯兰教法原则。本文可以启发读者,特别是SRI实践(来自西方哲学)在伊斯兰视角下适合Maqasid Shariah和Maslahah的能力。JEL分类:G2、G4、I13、N2如何引用:Wahab,M.Z.H和Naim,A.M.(2021)。根据Maqasid Shariah和Maslahah的观点对可持续和负责任投资(SRI)实践的审查。Etikonomi,20(2),xx–xx。https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v20i2.18053.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Etikonomi
Etikonomi ECONOMICS-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信