7 Day Comparative Effectiveness in Heartburn Relief and Endoscopic Healing. Randomized Controlled Trial using Omeprazole, Ranitidine, Antacids and Esolgafate, A Pre-Polymerized Cross-Linked Sucralfate (PCLS) Barrier Therapy

R. Mccullough
{"title":"7 Day Comparative Effectiveness in Heartburn Relief and Endoscopic Healing. Randomized Controlled Trial using Omeprazole, Ranitidine, Antacids and Esolgafate, A Pre-Polymerized Cross-Linked Sucralfate (PCLS) Barrier Therapy","authors":"R. Mccullough","doi":"10.33552/ajgh.2020.02.000526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic symptomatic Abstract Background: Barrier therapy has become an acceptable approach to manage heartburn in erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease (eGERD). Following ingestion, pre-polymerized cross-linked formulation of standard sucralfate (PCLS, Esolgafate) self-anneals to achieve surface concentrations of sucralfate that is 2400% greater than otherwise possible using standard sucralfate. Main argument: By blocking access of refluxate (bile acid, proteases, hydrochloric acid) to esophageal mucosa, PCLS is as effective as acid controlling therapies within the first 7 days of use. Patients and methods: Multi-center randomized controlled trial in three university medical centers in Bangladesh used a protocol approved and registered with the Medical Research Council. Statistical power of this 4 arm trial required 9 participants per arm. Of 77 patients evaluated for severe dyspepsia, 42 had eGERD and were randomized into four treatment groups with 3 patients lost to follow up, thus leaving 39 for data analysis previously divided into 4 treatment arms that received either 1.5 gram bid sucralfate (PCLS), 20mg bid omeprazole, 150mg bid ranitidine or 30ml qid of aluminum/magnesium hydroxide antacid, 400mg/400mg per 10ml. Each group was assessed for (a) adverse events, (b) symptomatic relief, (c) endoscopic healing and (d) comparative association of relief as a function of healing. Results: Comparable symptomatic relief occurred among 4 groups from 66%-90%, but with divergent healing rates. There was 80% complete healing for PCLS compared to only 30% for omeprazole and 0% for ranitidine and antacids. Conclusions: Relief by healing from PCLS in contrast to relief without healing from acid-controlling therapies implies acid exposure is not the single most significant contributor to eGERD symptoms, but that bile acids and proteases may also be involved. The latter observation is noteworthy when considering causes of nocturnal breakthrough heartburn and refractory GERD.","PeriodicalId":72038,"journal":{"name":"Academic journal of gastroenterology & hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic journal of gastroenterology & hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/ajgh.2020.02.000526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic symptomatic Abstract Background: Barrier therapy has become an acceptable approach to manage heartburn in erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease (eGERD). Following ingestion, pre-polymerized cross-linked formulation of standard sucralfate (PCLS, Esolgafate) self-anneals to achieve surface concentrations of sucralfate that is 2400% greater than otherwise possible using standard sucralfate. Main argument: By blocking access of refluxate (bile acid, proteases, hydrochloric acid) to esophageal mucosa, PCLS is as effective as acid controlling therapies within the first 7 days of use. Patients and methods: Multi-center randomized controlled trial in three university medical centers in Bangladesh used a protocol approved and registered with the Medical Research Council. Statistical power of this 4 arm trial required 9 participants per arm. Of 77 patients evaluated for severe dyspepsia, 42 had eGERD and were randomized into four treatment groups with 3 patients lost to follow up, thus leaving 39 for data analysis previously divided into 4 treatment arms that received either 1.5 gram bid sucralfate (PCLS), 20mg bid omeprazole, 150mg bid ranitidine or 30ml qid of aluminum/magnesium hydroxide antacid, 400mg/400mg per 10ml. Each group was assessed for (a) adverse events, (b) symptomatic relief, (c) endoscopic healing and (d) comparative association of relief as a function of healing. Results: Comparable symptomatic relief occurred among 4 groups from 66%-90%, but with divergent healing rates. There was 80% complete healing for PCLS compared to only 30% for omeprazole and 0% for ranitidine and antacids. Conclusions: Relief by healing from PCLS in contrast to relief without healing from acid-controlling therapies implies acid exposure is not the single most significant contributor to eGERD symptoms, but that bile acids and proteases may also be involved. The latter observation is noteworthy when considering causes of nocturnal breakthrough heartburn and refractory GERD.
胃灼热缓解和内窥镜治疗的7天比较疗效。随机对照试验使用奥美拉唑,雷尼替丁,抗酸剂和esolgatate,预聚合交联硫糖铝(PCLS)屏障治疗
慢性症状摘要背景:屏障治疗已成为治疗侵蚀性胃食管反流病(eGERD)烧心的一种可接受的方法。摄入后,标准三氯蔗糖酯(PCLS,Esolgafate)的预聚合交联制剂进行自退火,以获得比使用标准三氯苯酚酯可能的表面浓度高2400%的三氯苯酚。主要论点:通过阻断回流物(胆汁酸、蛋白酶、盐酸)进入食道粘膜,PCLS在使用的前7天内与控酸疗法一样有效。患者和方法:在孟加拉国三所大学医学中心进行的多中心随机对照试验使用了经医学研究委员会批准和注册的方案。这项4组试验的统计能力要求每组有9名参与者。在77名评估为严重消化不良的患者中,42名患者患有eGERD,并被随机分为四个治疗组,其中3名患者失访,因此,39名患者之前被分为4个治疗组进行数据分析,分别接受1.5克比得三氯福(PCLS)、20毫克比得奥美拉唑、150毫克比得雷尼替丁或30毫升qid的铝/镁氢氧化物抗酸剂,每10毫升400毫克/400毫克。评估各组的(a)不良事件,(b)症状缓解,(c)内镜愈合和(d)缓解与愈合的比较相关性。结果:4组的症状缓解率在66%-90%之间,但治愈率不同。PCLS有80%的完全愈合,而奥美拉唑只有30%,雷尼替丁和抗酸剂只有0%。结论:与酸控制治疗未愈合的缓解相比,PCLS愈合的缓解意味着酸暴露不是导致eGERD症状的最重要因素,但胆汁酸和蛋白酶也可能参与其中。考虑到夜间突破性烧心和难治性胃食管反流病的原因,后一个观察结果值得注意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信