Sedimentary record of historical extreme storm surges on the Gulf of Gdańsk coast, Baltic Sea

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Damian Moskalewicz , Witold Szczuciński , Przemysław Mroczek , Giedre Vaikutienė
{"title":"Sedimentary record of historical extreme storm surges on the Gulf of Gdańsk coast, Baltic Sea","authors":"Damian Moskalewicz ,&nbsp;Witold Szczuciński ,&nbsp;Przemysław Mroczek ,&nbsp;Giedre Vaikutienė","doi":"10.1016/j.margeo.2019.106084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The Baltic Sea<span> is commonly viewed as a region with a low frequency of coastal hazards such as tsunamis or extreme storm surges. However, historical sources indicate that in the past, several catastrophic storm surges resulted in coastal floods and related casualties. Their sedimentological records and reconstructions of paleostorminess were so far studied mainly in the westernmost (Denmark) and easternmost (Estonia) parts of the Baltic Sea. The present study focus on southern Baltic coast (Gulf of Gdańsk), where storm surge sedimentary deposits left within coastal peatlands were investigated, and related to historical record in order to compare recent risk estimations and predictions of storm surge levels to geological data. To achieve this aim, the collected </span></span>sediment cores were subjected to sedimentological, grain size, and diatom analyses, supported with </span><sup>137</sup>Cs, <sup>210</sup>Pb, and <sup>14</sup><span>C datings. Two types of sandy event deposits were identified, and interpreted to be storm deposits formed under an inundation regime and overwash<span> regime, respectively. The deposits formed under the inundation regime were characterised by an erosional lower boundary, massive structure and presence of rip-up clasts of underlying sediments, whereas the sediments formed under the overwash regime were low-angle planar cross-stratified medium sands with intercalations of massive fine sand. The recognized sandy storm deposits were dated mainly to the Little Ice Age period (XVIth–XIXth centuries). They were most likely left during the historical storms of 1825, 1872, and 1914 CE. It extends the sedimentary record of known historical events as mainly storms from 1497 CE and 1872 CE were reported previously from Baltic Sea. Notably, none of the historical storm events during the past 100-year period have formed a distinguishable sedimentary record. These findings clearly show that risk models and storm return period predictions, which are based on instrumental measurements from the last century, should also include geological evidence. The strongest storm surges from the past century may not be adequate reference of a worst case scenario.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":18229,"journal":{"name":"Marine Geology","volume":"420 ","pages":"Article 106084"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.margeo.2019.106084","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025322719302233","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The Baltic Sea is commonly viewed as a region with a low frequency of coastal hazards such as tsunamis or extreme storm surges. However, historical sources indicate that in the past, several catastrophic storm surges resulted in coastal floods and related casualties. Their sedimentological records and reconstructions of paleostorminess were so far studied mainly in the westernmost (Denmark) and easternmost (Estonia) parts of the Baltic Sea. The present study focus on southern Baltic coast (Gulf of Gdańsk), where storm surge sedimentary deposits left within coastal peatlands were investigated, and related to historical record in order to compare recent risk estimations and predictions of storm surge levels to geological data. To achieve this aim, the collected sediment cores were subjected to sedimentological, grain size, and diatom analyses, supported with 137Cs, 210Pb, and 14C datings. Two types of sandy event deposits were identified, and interpreted to be storm deposits formed under an inundation regime and overwash regime, respectively. The deposits formed under the inundation regime were characterised by an erosional lower boundary, massive structure and presence of rip-up clasts of underlying sediments, whereas the sediments formed under the overwash regime were low-angle planar cross-stratified medium sands with intercalations of massive fine sand. The recognized sandy storm deposits were dated mainly to the Little Ice Age period (XVIth–XIXth centuries). They were most likely left during the historical storms of 1825, 1872, and 1914 CE. It extends the sedimentary record of known historical events as mainly storms from 1497 CE and 1872 CE were reported previously from Baltic Sea. Notably, none of the historical storm events during the past 100-year period have formed a distinguishable sedimentary record. These findings clearly show that risk models and storm return period predictions, which are based on instrumental measurements from the last century, should also include geological evidence. The strongest storm surges from the past century may not be adequate reference of a worst case scenario.

Abstract Image

波罗的海Gdańsk湾沿岸历史极端风暴潮的沉积记录
波罗的海通常被认为是海啸或极端风暴潮等沿海灾害发生频率较低的地区。然而,历史资料表明,在过去,几次灾难性的风暴潮导致沿海洪水和相关人员伤亡。迄今为止,他们的沉积学记录和古风暴活动的重建主要在波罗的海最西端(丹麦)和最东端(爱沙尼亚)进行研究。目前的研究集中在波罗的海南部海岸(Gdańsk湾),在那里调查了沿海泥炭地内留下的风暴潮沉积沉积物,并与历史记录相联系,以便将最近的风暴潮水平的风险估计和预测与地质数据进行比较。为了实现这一目标,收集的沉积物岩心进行了沉积学、粒度和硅藻分析,并进行了137Cs、210Pb和14C测年。确定了两种类型的砂质事件沉积,并将其解释为分别在淹没和冲过条件下形成的风暴沉积。淹没条件下形成的沉积物具有侵蚀下边界、块状构造和下伏沉积物崩落碎屑的特征,而冲积条件下形成的沉积物为低角度平面交叉层状中砂,夹层为块状细砂。已确认的沙尘暴沉积主要发生在小冰河期(16 - 19世纪)。它们很可能是在公元1825年、1872年和1914年的历史风暴中留下的。它扩展了已知历史事件的沉积记录,因为之前报道的主要是1497年和1872年的波罗的海风暴。值得注意的是,在过去100年的历史风暴事件中,没有一次形成可区分的沉积记录。这些发现清楚地表明,基于上个世纪的仪器测量的风险模型和风暴回归期预测也应该包括地质证据。上个世纪最强的风暴潮可能不足以作为最坏情况的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine Geology
Marine Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
175
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Marine Geology is the premier international journal on marine geological processes in the broadest sense. We seek papers that are comprehensive, interdisciplinary and synthetic that will be lasting contributions to the field. Although most papers are based on regional studies, they must demonstrate new findings of international significance. We accept papers on subjects as diverse as seafloor hydrothermal systems, beach dynamics, early diagenesis, microbiological studies in sediments, palaeoclimate studies and geophysical studies of the seabed. We encourage papers that address emerging new fields, for example the influence of anthropogenic processes on coastal/marine geology and coastal/marine geoarchaeology. We insist that the papers are concerned with the marine realm and that they deal with geology: with rocks, sediments, and physical and chemical processes affecting them. Papers should address scientific hypotheses: highly descriptive data compilations or papers that deal only with marine management and risk assessment should be submitted to other journals. Papers on laboratory or modelling studies must demonstrate direct relevance to marine processes or deposits. The primary criteria for acceptance of papers is that the science is of high quality, novel, significant, and of broad international interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信