BRIBERY AND GRATUITY: REGULATORY ANALYSIS AND JUDICIAL RESPONSE

Ach. Tahir, Mahrus Ali, M. A. Setiawan
{"title":"BRIBERY AND GRATUITY: REGULATORY ANALYSIS AND JUDICIAL RESPONSE","authors":"Ach. Tahir, Mahrus Ali, M. A. Setiawan","doi":"10.26623/JIC.V6I2.4093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is aimed at analyzing the concepts and parameters to determine an act as a bribery and gratuity in the Anti-Corruption Law and court cases.  This involved the application of the doctrinal legal research to understand these differences. The results of this study showed that bribery requires a meeting of mind between the bribe givers and bribe recipients which is not found in gratuity. The reporting mechanism and the reversal burden of proof do not apply to bribery while Operation Catching Hand does not apply to gratuity due to its inability to satisfy the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. Criminal sanctions are also imposed on both the giver and the recipient of a bribe while the act of a giver in gratuity is not considered as a criminal offense. The study also found that the court failed to apply these essential differences.","PeriodicalId":31921,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ius Constituendum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ius Constituendum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26623/JIC.V6I2.4093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper is aimed at analyzing the concepts and parameters to determine an act as a bribery and gratuity in the Anti-Corruption Law and court cases.  This involved the application of the doctrinal legal research to understand these differences. The results of this study showed that bribery requires a meeting of mind between the bribe givers and bribe recipients which is not found in gratuity. The reporting mechanism and the reversal burden of proof do not apply to bribery while Operation Catching Hand does not apply to gratuity due to its inability to satisfy the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. Criminal sanctions are also imposed on both the giver and the recipient of a bribe while the act of a giver in gratuity is not considered as a criminal offense. The study also found that the court failed to apply these essential differences.
贿赂与小费:监管分析与司法回应
本文旨在分析《反腐败法》和法院案例中确定贿赂和酬金行为的概念和参数。这涉及到运用法律学说研究来理解这些差异。研究结果表明,贿赂需要行贿者和受贿者之间的思想交汇,而这在酬金中是没有的。举报机制和反向举证责任不适用于贿赂,而“抓手行动”由于无法满足《刑事诉讼法》的规定,不适用于酬金。行贿人和受贿人都会受到刑事制裁,而行贿人收取酬金的行为不被视为刑事犯罪。研究还发现,法院未能适用这些基本差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信