Simple Power and Sample Size Estimation for Non-Randomized Longitudinal Difference in Differences Studies

Yirui Hu, D. Hoover
{"title":"Simple Power and Sample Size Estimation for Non-Randomized Longitudinal Difference in Differences Studies","authors":"Yirui Hu, D. Hoover","doi":"10.4172/2155-6180.1000415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intervention effects on continuous longitudinal normal outcomes are often estimated in two-arm pre-post interventional studies with b≥1 pre- and k≥1 post-intervention measures using “Difference-in-Differences” (DD) analysis. Although randomization is preferred, non-randomized designs are often necessary due to practical constraints. Power/sample size estimation methods for non-randomized DD designs that incorporate the correlation structure of repeated measures are needed. We derive Generalized Least Squares (GLS) variance estimate of the intervention effect. For the commonly assumed compound symmetry (CS) correlation structure (where the correlation between all repeated measures is a constantρ) this leads to simple power and sample size estimation formulas that can be implemented using pencil and paper. Given a constrained number of total timepoints (T), having as close to possible equal number of pre-and post-intervention timepoints (b=k) achieves greatest power. When planning a study with 7 or less timepoints, given large ρ(ρ≥0.6) in multiple baseline measures (b≥2) or ρ≥0.8 in a single baseline setting, the improvement in power from a randomized versus non-randomized DD design may be minor. Extensions to cluster study designs and incorporation of time invariant covariates are given. Applications to study planning are illustrated using three real examples with T=4 timepoints and ρ ranging from 0.55 to 0.75.","PeriodicalId":87294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6180.1000415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Intervention effects on continuous longitudinal normal outcomes are often estimated in two-arm pre-post interventional studies with b≥1 pre- and k≥1 post-intervention measures using “Difference-in-Differences” (DD) analysis. Although randomization is preferred, non-randomized designs are often necessary due to practical constraints. Power/sample size estimation methods for non-randomized DD designs that incorporate the correlation structure of repeated measures are needed. We derive Generalized Least Squares (GLS) variance estimate of the intervention effect. For the commonly assumed compound symmetry (CS) correlation structure (where the correlation between all repeated measures is a constantρ) this leads to simple power and sample size estimation formulas that can be implemented using pencil and paper. Given a constrained number of total timepoints (T), having as close to possible equal number of pre-and post-intervention timepoints (b=k) achieves greatest power. When planning a study with 7 or less timepoints, given large ρ(ρ≥0.6) in multiple baseline measures (b≥2) or ρ≥0.8 in a single baseline setting, the improvement in power from a randomized versus non-randomized DD design may be minor. Extensions to cluster study designs and incorporation of time invariant covariates are given. Applications to study planning are illustrated using three real examples with T=4 timepoints and ρ ranging from 0.55 to 0.75.
差异研究中非随机纵向差异的简单幂和样本量估计
在采用“差异中的差异”(DD)分析的干预前和干预后b≥1和k≥1的双臂介入研究中,经常估计对连续纵向正常结果的干预效果。尽管随机化是优选的,但由于实际限制,非随机化设计通常是必要的。需要结合重复测量的相关性结构的非随机DD设计的功率/样本量估计方法。我们推导了干预效果的广义最小二乘方差估计。对于通常假设的复合对称性(CS)相关结构(其中所有重复测量之间的相关性是常数ρ),这导致了可以使用铅笔和纸来实现的简单的幂和样本量估计公式。给定有限数量的总时间点(T),具有尽可能相等数量的干预前和干预后时间点(b=k)可获得最大功率。当计划一项具有7个或更少时间点的研究时,在多个基线测量(b≥2)中给定大的ρ(ρ≥0.6)或在单个基线设置中给定ρ≥0.8,随机与非随机DD设计的功率改善可能很小。给出了聚类研究设计的扩展和时不变协变量的合并。通过三个实际例子说明了研究计划的应用,其中T=4个时间点,ρ范围为0.55至0.75。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信