Scoping Review: Interprofessional Simulation as an Effective Modality to Teaching Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies in the Emergency Department

Lily Barton, K. Lackie, Stephen Miller
{"title":"Scoping Review: Interprofessional Simulation as an Effective Modality to Teaching Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies in the Emergency Department","authors":"Lily Barton, K. Lackie, Stephen Miller","doi":"10.22230/jripe.2023v13n1a349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A scoping review was conducted to map the current body of research pertaining to simulation-enhanced interprofessional education (Sim-IPE) as a modality for teaching interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in the emergencydepartment (ED).\nMethods and Findings: The research team followed the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews framework. Studies were included if they involved two or more healthcare professions, utilized simulation as the learning method for interprofessional education (IPE), involved simulation pertaining to the ED, and identified at least one Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative or Interprofessional Education Collaborative IPC competency as a learning outcome. In total, 896 studies were included for title and abstract screening and 806 were deemed irrelevant. Ninety full-text studies were assessed for eligibility and 34 were included in the review.\nConclusions: Eighteen studies found Sim-IPE to be an effective method for teaching interprofessional competencies in the ED. Simulation-enhanced interprofessional education appears to be a promising methodology for teaching IPC competencies to ED healthcare professionals. Interprofessional collaboration competency frameworks should be utilized to guide Sim-IPE, and assessment tools specific to interprofessional competencies should be used in the assessment phase of Sim-IPE. Faculty development is a crucial component of Sim-IPE. Further longitudinal and outcome-based research is required.","PeriodicalId":89817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22230/jripe.2023v13n1a349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A scoping review was conducted to map the current body of research pertaining to simulation-enhanced interprofessional education (Sim-IPE) as a modality for teaching interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in the emergencydepartment (ED). Methods and Findings: The research team followed the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews framework. Studies were included if they involved two or more healthcare professions, utilized simulation as the learning method for interprofessional education (IPE), involved simulation pertaining to the ED, and identified at least one Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative or Interprofessional Education Collaborative IPC competency as a learning outcome. In total, 896 studies were included for title and abstract screening and 806 were deemed irrelevant. Ninety full-text studies were assessed for eligibility and 34 were included in the review. Conclusions: Eighteen studies found Sim-IPE to be an effective method for teaching interprofessional competencies in the ED. Simulation-enhanced interprofessional education appears to be a promising methodology for teaching IPC competencies to ED healthcare professionals. Interprofessional collaboration competency frameworks should be utilized to guide Sim-IPE, and assessment tools specific to interprofessional competencies should be used in the assessment phase of Sim-IPE. Faculty development is a crucial component of Sim-IPE. Further longitudinal and outcome-based research is required.
范围界定综述:跨专业模拟是急诊科跨专业协作能力教学的有效方式
背景:进行了一项范围界定审查,以绘制当前与模拟增强跨专业教育(Sim-IPE)相关的研究主体,将其作为急诊科跨专业合作(IPC)的教学模式。方法和发现:研究团队遵循PRISMA范围界定审查扩展框架。如果研究涉及两个或两个以上的医疗保健专业,使用模拟作为跨专业教育(IPE)的学习方法,涉及与ED相关的模拟,并确定至少一个加拿大跨专业健康合作或跨专业教育合作IPC能力作为学习结果,则纳入研究。总共有896项研究被纳入标题和摘要筛选,806项被认为是无关的。对90项全文研究的合格性进行了评估,34项纳入了审查。结论:18项研究发现Sim-IPE是ED跨专业能力教学的有效方法。模拟强化跨专业教育似乎是向ED医疗保健专业人员教授IPC能力的一种很有前途的方法。应利用跨专业协作能力框架来指导Sim IPE,并在Sim IPE的评估阶段使用针对跨专业能力的评估工具。师资发展是Sim IPE的重要组成部分。需要进一步的纵向和基于结果的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书