ANALISIS KELAYAKAN BAHASA DALAM BUKU TEKS TEMA 1 KELAS I SEKOLAH DASAR KURIKULUM 2013

Profesi Pendidikan Dasar Pub Date : 2018-01-08 DOI:10.23917/PPD.V3I2.2773

Arif Wiyat Purnanto, A. Mustadi

{"title":"ANALISIS KELAYAKAN BAHASA DALAM BUKU TEKS TEMA 1 KELAS I SEKOLAH DASAR KURIKULUM 2013","authors":"Arif Wiyat Purnanto, A. Mustadi","doi":"10.23917/PPD.V3I2.2773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to describe language appropriateness of 2013 Curriculum text book for 1st Grade’s 1st Theme.This research was conducted with qualitative approach by document analysis method. The document utilized in this research was 1st Grade’s 1st Theme of text book which was not published by Ministry of Education and Culture. The research data was collected through content analysis utilizing validated instuments. The data was analyzed with Krippendof quantitatie analysis techniqe including data collection, sample determination, data recording, data reduction, conclusion drawing and recount. The results show that 1st book of non Ministry of Education and Culture publication has fulfilled all the determined criteria achieving good grade with 82.69% of Language Appropriateness. The weakness of this book is inappropriate materials sequence order, utilization of inappropriate words for children development, and utilization of inconsistent icons/symbols. The 2nd book of non Ministry of Education and Culture publication had fulfilled all the determined criteria achieving fair grade with 78.36% of Language Adbisability. The weakness of this book was utilization of inappropriate words for children development, and material suitability to intelectual development of the students.","PeriodicalId":31114,"journal":{"name":"Profesi Pendidikan Dasar","volume":"3 1","pages":"102-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Profesi Pendidikan Dasar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23917/PPD.V3I2.2773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 15

Abstract

This research aimed to describe language appropriateness of 2013 Curriculum text book for 1st Grade’s 1st Theme.This research was conducted with qualitative approach by document analysis method. The document utilized in this research was 1st Grade’s 1st Theme of text book which was not published by Ministry of Education and Culture. The research data was collected through content analysis utilizing validated instuments. The data was analyzed with Krippendof quantitatie analysis techniqe including data collection, sample determination, data recording, data reduction, conclusion drawing and recount. The results show that 1st book of non Ministry of Education and Culture publication has fulfilled all the determined criteria achieving good grade with 82.69% of Language Appropriateness. The weakness of this book is inappropriate materials sequence order, utilization of inappropriate words for children development, and utilization of inconsistent icons/symbols. The 2nd book of non Ministry of Education and Culture publication had fulfilled all the determined criteria achieving fair grade with 78.36% of Language Adbisability. The weakness of this book was utilization of inappropriate words for children development, and material suitability to intelectual development of the students.

查看原文本刊更多论文

本研究采用文献分析法，采用定性研究方法，对2013年一年级第一主题课程教材的语言适宜性进行了描述。本研究使用的文献是一年级的第一主题教材，该教材未由教育和文化部出版。研究数据是通过使用经验证的仪器进行内容分析收集的。采用Krippendof定量分析技术对数据进行分析，包括数据收集、样品测定、数据记录、数据还原、结论得出和重新计数。结果表明，非教育和文化部出版的第一本书达到了所有确定的标准，获得了82.69%的良好成绩。这本书的弱点是不恰当的材料顺序，不恰当的词语用于儿童发展，以及不一致的图标/符号的使用。非教育和文化部出版的第二本书满足了所有确定的标准，获得了78.36%的语言可接受性。这本书的弱点是使用了不恰当的词语来促进儿童的发展，以及材料对学生智力发展的适应性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Profesi Pendidikan Dasar

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks