The work in progress of a developing nation’s Triple Helix and its impact on patent commercialization. The case of Sri Lanka

IF 2.9 Q2 MANAGEMENT
R. Ferdinands, S. Azam, A. Khatibi
{"title":"The work in progress of a developing nation’s Triple Helix and its impact on patent commercialization. The case of Sri Lanka","authors":"R. Ferdinands, S. Azam, A. Khatibi","doi":"10.1108/jstpm-06-2022-0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to contribute to the understanding of the innovation environment of a developing nation through the Triple Helix model, revealing the existing inter-relationships between the three Helixes of Academia–Industry–Government. It sets out to find out the relationship and impact of the three Helixes on the most crucial stage of the innovation process: the commercialisation of patents, and to ascertain if there is a varying impact determined by patent ownership.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis cross-sectional study uses the survey method based on the views expressed by 220 Sri Lankan registered patent holders and categorised by organisational and individual ownership. The sample is drawn from the database of the National Intellectual Property Office of Sri Lanka and patents registered through the Patent Cooperation Treaty, extracted from the World Intellectual Property Organisation Patent Scope database. The survey was carried out in 2019 and limited to patents registered during the period 2010–2014.\n\n\nFindings\nThe empirical findings indicate weak inter-relationship between Academia support, Industry support and patent commercial success, while the support of the Government Helix is non-significant in the commercial stage. The findings also indicate two different support standards existing in each Helix for the two ownership groups.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study is limited to a five-year window in a relatively early period in the country’s innovation policy development. The study model is also limited by the non-inclusion of mediators such as government-backed affiliated agencies and academia technical transfer offices which if incorporated would improve the study model and be more reflective of the actual environment and their role as change agents bridging the transition to a hybrid Triple Helix.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study findings capture the inter-relationships of the Triple Helix existing in a developing country at the most crucial stage of the innovation process. It helps policymakers identify the gaps in each Helix that stands wanting and take measures to rectify them by creating a more favourable National Innovation System. An innovative environment that will facilitate patent holders achieve higher technological transfers and commercial success rates.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe findings disclosure of two different support standards existing in each Helix for the two patent ownership groups poses a challenge for policymakers and challenges the core objective of increasing the commercial success of patents granted. The findings strengthen the need for a more robust support system to be put in place that would empower and facilitate the individual patent owner to increase the share of economic value arising from this underutilised patent group.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study contributes by furthering the Triple Helix model in a social context and micro-setting by operationalising the theoretical practices. The study also gives insight into each Helix’s interaction and contribution during the most crucial stage of innovation management in a developing economy and its impact on the two categories of patent ownership which is scarce.\n","PeriodicalId":45751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jstpm-06-2022-0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to contribute to the understanding of the innovation environment of a developing nation through the Triple Helix model, revealing the existing inter-relationships between the three Helixes of Academia–Industry–Government. It sets out to find out the relationship and impact of the three Helixes on the most crucial stage of the innovation process: the commercialisation of patents, and to ascertain if there is a varying impact determined by patent ownership. Design/methodology/approach This cross-sectional study uses the survey method based on the views expressed by 220 Sri Lankan registered patent holders and categorised by organisational and individual ownership. The sample is drawn from the database of the National Intellectual Property Office of Sri Lanka and patents registered through the Patent Cooperation Treaty, extracted from the World Intellectual Property Organisation Patent Scope database. The survey was carried out in 2019 and limited to patents registered during the period 2010–2014. Findings The empirical findings indicate weak inter-relationship between Academia support, Industry support and patent commercial success, while the support of the Government Helix is non-significant in the commercial stage. The findings also indicate two different support standards existing in each Helix for the two ownership groups. Research limitations/implications The study is limited to a five-year window in a relatively early period in the country’s innovation policy development. The study model is also limited by the non-inclusion of mediators such as government-backed affiliated agencies and academia technical transfer offices which if incorporated would improve the study model and be more reflective of the actual environment and their role as change agents bridging the transition to a hybrid Triple Helix. Practical implications The study findings capture the inter-relationships of the Triple Helix existing in a developing country at the most crucial stage of the innovation process. It helps policymakers identify the gaps in each Helix that stands wanting and take measures to rectify them by creating a more favourable National Innovation System. An innovative environment that will facilitate patent holders achieve higher technological transfers and commercial success rates. Social implications The findings disclosure of two different support standards existing in each Helix for the two patent ownership groups poses a challenge for policymakers and challenges the core objective of increasing the commercial success of patents granted. The findings strengthen the need for a more robust support system to be put in place that would empower and facilitate the individual patent owner to increase the share of economic value arising from this underutilised patent group. Originality/value This study contributes by furthering the Triple Helix model in a social context and micro-setting by operationalising the theoretical practices. The study also gives insight into each Helix’s interaction and contribution during the most crucial stage of innovation management in a developing economy and its impact on the two categories of patent ownership which is scarce.
发展中国家“三螺旋”机制的进展及其对专利商业化的影响。以斯里兰卡为例
目的本研究旨在通过三重螺旋模型来帮助理解发展中国家的创新环境,揭示学术-产业-政府三重螺旋之间存在的相互关系。它旨在找出三个螺旋对创新过程中最关键阶段(专利商业化)的关系和影响,并确定是否存在由专利所有权决定的不同影响。设计/方法/方法这项横断面研究使用了基于220名斯里兰卡注册专利持有人表达的观点的调查方法,并按组织和个人所有权进行了分类。样本来自斯里兰卡国家知识产权局的数据库,以及通过《专利合作条约》注册的专利,摘自世界知识产权组织专利范围数据库。该调查于2019年进行,仅限于2010-2014年期间注册的专利。研究结果表明,学术支持、行业支持和专利商业成功之间的相互关系较弱,而政府螺旋线的支持在商业阶段并不显著。研究结果还表明,对于两个所有权集团,每个Helix都存在两种不同的支持标准。研究局限性/含义该研究仅限于国家创新政策制定相对早期的五年窗口期。研究模式还受到不包括中介机构的限制,如政府支持的附属机构和学术界技术转让办公室,如果将其纳入,将改进研究模式,并更能反映实际环境及其作为变革推动者的作用,为向混合三重螺旋过渡提供桥梁。实际含义研究结果反映了发展中国家在创新过程最关键阶段存在的三重螺旋的相互关系。它有助于决策者确定每个螺旋中存在的差距,并采取措施通过创建更有利的国家创新体系来纠正这些差距。一个有利于专利持有人实现更高技术转让和商业成功率的创新环境。社会影响两个专利所有权群体的每个螺旋中存在的两个不同支持标准的调查结果披露给决策者带来了挑战,并挑战了提高授予专利的商业成功率的核心目标。这些发现加强了建立一个更强大的支持系统的必要性,该系统将授权和促进个人专利所有者增加这一未充分利用的专利群体所产生的经济价值份额。原创性/价值本研究通过对理论实践的操作,在社会背景和微观环境中进一步推进了三重螺旋模型。该研究还深入了解了在发展中经济体创新管理的最关键阶段,每个螺旋的互动和贡献,以及它对两类稀缺专利所有权的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信