Design for Reliability: Experimental and Numerical Simulation of Cased and Perforated Completions with Standalone Screen

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM
Morteza Roostaei, M. Soroush, Farshad Mohammadtabar, M. Mohammadtabar, S. A. Hosseini, Mahdi Mahmoudi, M. Sadrzadeh, A. Ghalambor, Vahidoddin Fattahpour
{"title":"Design for Reliability: Experimental and Numerical Simulation of Cased and Perforated Completions with Standalone Screen","authors":"Morteza Roostaei, M. Soroush, Farshad Mohammadtabar, M. Mohammadtabar, S. A. Hosseini, Mahdi Mahmoudi, M. Sadrzadeh, A. Ghalambor, Vahidoddin Fattahpour","doi":"10.2118/201315-PA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The historical challenges and high failure rate of using standalone screen in cased and perforated wellbores pushed several operators to consider cased-hole gravel packing or frac packing as the preferred completion. Despite the reliability of these options, they are more expensive than a standalone screen completion.\n In this paper, we employ a combined physical laboratory testing and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for laboratory scale and field scale to assess the potential use of the standalone screen in completing the cased and perforated wells. The aim is to design a fit-to-purpose sand control method in cased and perforated wells and provide guidelines in perforation strategy and investigate screen and perforation characteristics. More specifically, the simultaneous effect of screen and perforation parameters, near wellbore conditions on pressure distribution and pressure drop are investigated in detail.\n A common mistake in completion operation is to separately focus on the design of the screen based on the reservoir sand print and design of the perforation. If sand control is deemed to be required, the perforation strategy and design must go hand in hand with sand control design. Several experiments and simulation models were designed to better understand the effect of perforation density, the fill-up of the annular gap between the casing and screen, perforation collapse, and formation and perforation damage on pressure drop. The experiments consisted of a series of step-rate tests to investigate the role of fluid rate on pressure drop and sand production. There is a critical rate at which the sand filling up the annular gap will fluidize. Both test results and CFD simulation scenarios are comparatively capable to establish the relation between wellbore pressure drop and perforation parameters and determine the optimized design.\n The results of this study highlight the workflow to optimize the standalone screen design for the application in cased and perforated completions. The proper design of standalone screen and perforation parameters allows maintaining cost-effective well productivity. Results of this work could be used for choosing the proper sand control and perforation strategy.","PeriodicalId":51165,"journal":{"name":"SPE Drilling & Completion","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Drilling & Completion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/201315-PA","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The historical challenges and high failure rate of using standalone screen in cased and perforated wellbores pushed several operators to consider cased-hole gravel packing or frac packing as the preferred completion. Despite the reliability of these options, they are more expensive than a standalone screen completion. In this paper, we employ a combined physical laboratory testing and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for laboratory scale and field scale to assess the potential use of the standalone screen in completing the cased and perforated wells. The aim is to design a fit-to-purpose sand control method in cased and perforated wells and provide guidelines in perforation strategy and investigate screen and perforation characteristics. More specifically, the simultaneous effect of screen and perforation parameters, near wellbore conditions on pressure distribution and pressure drop are investigated in detail. A common mistake in completion operation is to separately focus on the design of the screen based on the reservoir sand print and design of the perforation. If sand control is deemed to be required, the perforation strategy and design must go hand in hand with sand control design. Several experiments and simulation models were designed to better understand the effect of perforation density, the fill-up of the annular gap between the casing and screen, perforation collapse, and formation and perforation damage on pressure drop. The experiments consisted of a series of step-rate tests to investigate the role of fluid rate on pressure drop and sand production. There is a critical rate at which the sand filling up the annular gap will fluidize. Both test results and CFD simulation scenarios are comparatively capable to establish the relation between wellbore pressure drop and perforation parameters and determine the optimized design. The results of this study highlight the workflow to optimize the standalone screen design for the application in cased and perforated completions. The proper design of standalone screen and perforation parameters allows maintaining cost-effective well productivity. Results of this work could be used for choosing the proper sand control and perforation strategy.
可靠性设计:独立筛管套管和射孔完井的实验和数值模拟
在套管井和射孔井中使用独立筛管的历史挑战和高故障率促使一些作业者考虑将套管井砾石充填或压裂充填作为首选完井方法。尽管这些选择都很可靠,但它们比独立的屏幕完井更昂贵。在本文中,我们采用了实验室规模和现场规模的物理实验室测试和计算流体动力学(CFD)相结合的方法来评估独立筛管在完井和射孔井中的潜在用途。目的是设计适合套管井和射孔井的防砂方法,为射孔策略提供指导,并研究筛管和射孔特性。更具体地说,详细研究了筛管和射孔参数、近井条件对压力分布和压降的同时影响。完井作业中一个常见的错误是,根据油藏砂印和射孔设计分别关注筛管的设计。如果认为需要防砂,则射孔策略和设计必须与防砂设计相结合。为了更好地理解射孔密度、套管与筛管之间环空空隙的填充、射孔塌陷以及地层和射孔损伤对压降的影响,设计了几个实验和模拟模型。实验包括一系列步进速率测试,以研究流体速率对压降和出砂的影响。填满环空间隙的砂流化有一个临界速率。无论是试验结果还是CFD模拟场景,都比较能够建立井筒压降与射孔参数之间的关系,并确定优化设计方案。这项研究的结果强调了优化独立筛管设计的工作流程,适用于套管井和射孔完井。独立筛管和射孔参数的合理设计可以保持经济高效的油井产能。研究结果可为选择合适的防砂和射孔策略提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SPE Drilling & Completion
SPE Drilling & Completion 工程技术-工程:石油
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Covers horizontal and directional drilling, drilling fluids, bit technology, sand control, perforating, cementing, well control, completions and drilling operations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信