Multimodal learning: How task types affect learning of students with reading difficulties

Q4 Health Professions
Sunjung Kim Thao, L. Lombardino, S. Tibi, Amber Gleghorn
{"title":"Multimodal learning: How task types affect learning of students with reading difficulties","authors":"Sunjung Kim Thao, L. Lombardino, S. Tibi, Amber Gleghorn","doi":"10.21849/cacd.2021.00500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The prevalence of multimedia technology in the current educational settings has increased the need for investigating how individual differences such as reading difficulties moderate multimedia learning. Given that instructional designs closely interact with task characteristics and requirements, we aimed to explore how students with reading difficulties perform various types of learning tasks within the context of multimedia instruction.Methods: College students with and without reading difficulties viewed a multimedia lesson on stem cell research while their eye movements were recorded. After viewing the multimedia slides, students completed four tasks pertaining to the content provided in the lesson.Results: Students with reading difficulties performed poorer than their peers on the procedural task while the groups’ performance did not differ on definitional, infographic, and argumentative tasks. Further, there was no difference in the eye fixation counts and gaze duration between the two groups.Conclusions: Our findings underscore the importance of an awareness that the types of tasks used to assess students’ knowledge may impact their performance. Information of this nature may be useful in determining optimal learning experiences for students with learning difficulties.","PeriodicalId":10238,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21849/cacd.2021.00500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The prevalence of multimedia technology in the current educational settings has increased the need for investigating how individual differences such as reading difficulties moderate multimedia learning. Given that instructional designs closely interact with task characteristics and requirements, we aimed to explore how students with reading difficulties perform various types of learning tasks within the context of multimedia instruction.Methods: College students with and without reading difficulties viewed a multimedia lesson on stem cell research while their eye movements were recorded. After viewing the multimedia slides, students completed four tasks pertaining to the content provided in the lesson.Results: Students with reading difficulties performed poorer than their peers on the procedural task while the groups’ performance did not differ on definitional, infographic, and argumentative tasks. Further, there was no difference in the eye fixation counts and gaze duration between the two groups.Conclusions: Our findings underscore the importance of an awareness that the types of tasks used to assess students’ knowledge may impact their performance. Information of this nature may be useful in determining optimal learning experiences for students with learning difficulties.
多模态学习:任务类型如何影响阅读困难学生的学习
目的:多媒体技术在当前教育环境中的普及增加了研究个体差异(如阅读困难)如何调节多媒体学习的必要性。鉴于教学设计与任务特征和要求密切相关,我们旨在探索有阅读困难的学生如何在多媒体教学背景下执行各种类型的学习任务。方法:有阅读困难和无阅读困难的大学生观看一堂关于干细胞研究的多媒体课,同时记录他们的眼球运动。观看完多媒体幻灯片后,学生完成了与本课内容相关的四项任务。结果:有阅读困难的学生在程序性任务上的表现比同龄人差,而两组在定义、信息图和议论文任务上的成绩没有差异。此外,两组之间的眼睛注视次数和注视持续时间没有差异。结论:我们的研究结果强调了意识到用于评估学生知识的任务类型可能会影响他们的表现的重要性。这种性质的信息可能有助于为有学习困难的学生确定最佳学习体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders
Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders Health Professions-Speech and Hearing
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信