{"title":"On relative complementizers and relative pronouns","authors":"C. Poletto, Emanuela Sanfelici","doi":"10.1075/LV.16002.POL","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper explores the syntactic status of che and (il)\n qual(e) relativizers, i.e. what are standardly referred to as relative complementizers and\n relative pronouns, in Old and Modern Italian and Italian varieties and proposes a unified analysis for both types of items. It\n takes into account the ongoing debate regarding the categorial status of relativizers (Kayne\n 1975, 2008, 2010; Lehmann 1984; Manzini & Savoia 2003, 2011, among many others) and aims at showing that what we call complementizers are not\n C0 heads, as commonly assumed. Instead, we propose that both relative “complementizers” and “pronouns” have the\n same categorial status, i.e. they are wh-items and are part of the relative clause-internal head.","PeriodicalId":53947,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Variation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Variation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/LV.16002.POL","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
This paper explores the syntactic status of che and (il)
qual(e) relativizers, i.e. what are standardly referred to as relative complementizers and
relative pronouns, in Old and Modern Italian and Italian varieties and proposes a unified analysis for both types of items. It
takes into account the ongoing debate regarding the categorial status of relativizers (Kayne
1975, 2008, 2010; Lehmann 1984; Manzini & Savoia 2003, 2011, among many others) and aims at showing that what we call complementizers are not
C0 heads, as commonly assumed. Instead, we propose that both relative “complementizers” and “pronouns” have the
same categorial status, i.e. they are wh-items and are part of the relative clause-internal head.
期刊介绍:
Linguistic Variation is an international, peer-reviewed journal that focuses on the study of linguistic variation. It seeks to investigate to what extent the study of linguistic variation can shed light on the broader issue of language-particular versus language-universal properties, on the interaction between what is fixed and necessary on the one hand and what is variable and contingent on the other. This enterprise involves properly defining and delineating the notion of linguistic variation by identifying loci of variation. What are the variable properties of natural language and what is its invariant core?