Systematic review of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction via group videoconferencing: Feasibility, acceptability, safety, and efficacy.

IF 1.8 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Alesia Moulton-Perkins, D. Moulton, K. Cavanagh, Alex Jozavi, C. Strauss
{"title":"Systematic review of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction via group videoconferencing: Feasibility, acceptability, safety, and efficacy.","authors":"Alesia Moulton-Perkins, D. Moulton, K. Cavanagh, Alex Jozavi, C. Strauss","doi":"10.1037/INT0000216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) are effective in reducing distress among people with physical or mental health problems. However, implementation is limited by variable geographic provision, ability to travel, and the need for remote service delivery during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis. Integration with Internet-enabled technologies like videoconferencing potentially enhances access. This article reports a systematic review exploring the feasibility, acceptability, safety, and efficacy of delivering MBCT/MBSR by videoconferencing (MBCT/MBSR-VC). No restrictions were made about population or study design. Eleven online databases were searched and 10 studies met inclusion criteria. Narrative synthesis was used because of study heterogeneity. Articles featured physical health and nonclinical samples, but not mental health. Three studies had moderate-strong methodological quality. Results supported the feasibility and acceptability of MBCT/MBSR-VC. Considerations of safety were largely unreported. MBCT/MBSR-VC demonstrated medium positive effects on mental health outcomes compared with inactive controls (ds = 0.44 -0.71), and little difference compared with active controls like in-person delivery (all confidence intervals crossed zero). Evidence regarding mindfulness or self-compassion as potential mechanisms of action was inconclusive. Future implementation research should target mental health populations using noninferiority designs. Adapting MBCT/MBSR to remote delivery will require development of guidelines and training packages to ensure best practice in this medium and adherence to evidence-based MBCT/MBSR models.","PeriodicalId":46982,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/INT0000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) are effective in reducing distress among people with physical or mental health problems. However, implementation is limited by variable geographic provision, ability to travel, and the need for remote service delivery during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis. Integration with Internet-enabled technologies like videoconferencing potentially enhances access. This article reports a systematic review exploring the feasibility, acceptability, safety, and efficacy of delivering MBCT/MBSR by videoconferencing (MBCT/MBSR-VC). No restrictions were made about population or study design. Eleven online databases were searched and 10 studies met inclusion criteria. Narrative synthesis was used because of study heterogeneity. Articles featured physical health and nonclinical samples, but not mental health. Three studies had moderate-strong methodological quality. Results supported the feasibility and acceptability of MBCT/MBSR-VC. Considerations of safety were largely unreported. MBCT/MBSR-VC demonstrated medium positive effects on mental health outcomes compared with inactive controls (ds = 0.44 -0.71), and little difference compared with active controls like in-person delivery (all confidence intervals crossed zero). Evidence regarding mindfulness or self-compassion as potential mechanisms of action was inconclusive. Future implementation research should target mental health populations using noninferiority designs. Adapting MBCT/MBSR to remote delivery will require development of guidelines and training packages to ensure best practice in this medium and adherence to evidence-based MBCT/MBSR models.
通过小组视频会议对正念认知疗法和正念减压的系统回顾:可行性、可接受性、安全性和有效性。
正念认知疗法(MBCT)和正念减压疗法(MBSR)在减轻身体或心理健康问题患者的痛苦方面是有效的。然而,在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)危机期间,实施受到不同地理条件、旅行能力以及远程服务提供需求的限制。与支持互联网的技术(如视频会议)的集成可能会增强访问。本文系统综述了通过视频会议(MBCT/MBSR- vc)进行MBCT/MBSR治疗的可行性、可接受性、安全性和有效性。没有对人群或研究设计进行限制。检索了11个在线数据库,有10项研究符合纳入标准。由于研究异质性,采用叙事综合。文章以身体健康和非临床样本为特色,但不包括心理健康。三项研究具有中强的方法学质量。结果支持MBCT/MBSR-VC的可行性和可接受性。安全方面的考虑基本上没有报道。与不活跃的对照组相比,MBCT/MBSR-VC对心理健康结果表现出中等的积极影响(ds = 0.44 -0.71),与主动的对照组(如当面交付)相比差异不大(所有置信区间均为零)。关于正念或自我同情作为潜在行为机制的证据尚无定论。未来的实施研究应该针对心理健康人群使用非劣效性设计。使MBCT/MBSR适应远程交付需要制定指导方针和培训包,以确保这一媒介的最佳实践,并坚持以证据为基础的MBCT/MBSR模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTHERAPY INTEGRATION PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Journal of Psychotherapy Integration offers original peer-reviewed papers that move beyond the confines of single-school or single-theory approaches to psychotherapy and behavior change. The journal publishes articles that significantly advance the knowledge of psychotherapy integration and present new data, theory, or clinical techniques relevant to psychotherapy integration. Coverage includes articles integrating the knowledge of psychotherapy and behavior change with developments in the broader fields of psychology and psychiatry (e.g., cognitive sciences, psychobiology, health psychology, and social psychology). (formerly published by Kluwer Academic/Plenum)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信