Functional magnetic resonance for the localization of eloquent areas in epilepsy surgery candidates: comparison to cortical electrostimulation mapping

D. Vázquez-Barrón , M. Montes de Oca , F. Espinoza-Velázquez , F. Velasco , A.L. Velasco
{"title":"Functional magnetic resonance for the localization of eloquent areas in epilepsy surgery candidates: comparison to cortical electrostimulation mapping","authors":"D. Vázquez-Barrón ,&nbsp;M. Montes de Oca ,&nbsp;F. Espinoza-Velázquez ,&nbsp;F. Velasco ,&nbsp;A.L. Velasco","doi":"10.1016/j.hgmx.2017.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Surgical treatment for epilepsy comprises resective techniques in most patients.</p><p>In those with epilepsy of sites close to highly specialized or eloquent areas, very precise anatomic delimitation is required. So far the most reliable method for anatomic localization of function is direct cortical electrostimulation mapping (CEM). Functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) is a non-invasive method that could also be used for this purpose.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine the sensitivity and specificity of fMRI for the identification of eloquent areas compared to CEM in epilepsy surgery candidates.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four patients who underwent presurgical fMRI and grid implantation in eloquent areas for epileptic focus localization with video-EEG were included in this study. Once the seizure onset site was identified, CEM was performed and a postsurgical structural magnetic resonance was reconstructed with Eclipse software to determine grid position. After correlating pre and postsurgical images, the site of the grid contacts where eloquent areas were identified was compared to localization by fMRI.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred and twenty electrodes in six eloquent areas were evaluated and compared to location by fMRI: five hand motor areas and one language area in the temporal lobe. We found a global sensitivity of 0.86, specificity of 0.96, positive predictive value of 0.89, negative predictive value of 0.95 and accuracy of 0.94 for fMRI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this study fMRI showed high specificity and proved to be useful for language lateralization. It is necessary to study this technique further, especially for language areas.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":31559,"journal":{"name":"Revista Medica del Hospital General de Mexico","volume":"81 4","pages":"Pages 184-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hgmx.2017.07.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Medica del Hospital General de Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0185106318300386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Surgical treatment for epilepsy comprises resective techniques in most patients.

In those with epilepsy of sites close to highly specialized or eloquent areas, very precise anatomic delimitation is required. So far the most reliable method for anatomic localization of function is direct cortical electrostimulation mapping (CEM). Functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) is a non-invasive method that could also be used for this purpose.

Objective

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of fMRI for the identification of eloquent areas compared to CEM in epilepsy surgery candidates.

Methods

Four patients who underwent presurgical fMRI and grid implantation in eloquent areas for epileptic focus localization with video-EEG were included in this study. Once the seizure onset site was identified, CEM was performed and a postsurgical structural magnetic resonance was reconstructed with Eclipse software to determine grid position. After correlating pre and postsurgical images, the site of the grid contacts where eloquent areas were identified was compared to localization by fMRI.

Results

One hundred and twenty electrodes in six eloquent areas were evaluated and compared to location by fMRI: five hand motor areas and one language area in the temporal lobe. We found a global sensitivity of 0.86, specificity of 0.96, positive predictive value of 0.89, negative predictive value of 0.95 and accuracy of 0.94 for fMRI.

Conclusion

In this study fMRI showed high specificity and proved to be useful for language lateralization. It is necessary to study this technique further, especially for language areas.

功能磁共振定位癫痫手术候选人的流利区:与皮质电刺激测绘的比较
大多数癫痫患者的手术治疗包括不同的技术。对于那些癫痫的部位靠近高度专业化或雄辩的区域,需要非常精确的解剖划分。到目前为止,最可靠的功能解剖定位方法是直接皮层电刺激映射(CEM)。功能磁共振(fMRI)是一种非侵入性方法,也可用于此目的。目的比较功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)与脑电成像(CEM)鉴别癫痫手术患者脑区的敏感性和特异性。方法对4例术前行功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和显像区栅格植入进行癫痫病灶定位的患者进行研究。一旦确定癫痫发作部位,进行CEM,并使用Eclipse软件重建术后结构磁共振以确定网格位置。在将术前和术后的图像进行对比后,通过fMRI将识别出的有意义区域的网格接触位置与定位进行比较。结果对6个雄辩区(颞叶5个手部运动区和1个语言区)的120个电极进行了fMRI定位。我们发现fMRI的总体敏感性为0.86,特异性为0.96,阳性预测值为0.89,阴性预测值为0.95,准确性为0.94。结论fMRI对语言偏侧的诊断具有较高的特异性。有必要进一步研究这种技术,特别是在语言领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of the Hospital General de Mexico is the official organ of the Medical Society of the Hospital General de Mexico. The journal accepts articles in Spanish or in English on the field of hospital medicine. The journal publishes original articles, clinical cases, reviews articles, history notes, issues on medical education, short communications and editorials at the invitation of the Society. All articles are double blind peer reviewed by at least 2 reviewers and finally classified as accepted or rejected by the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信