Delivering A Good Speech by Identifying the Interpersonal Meaning Found in Joe Biden’s Victory Speech: A Case on Systemic Functional Linguistics

Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of Intercultural Communication Pub Date : 2022-11-30 DOI:10.36923/jicc.v22i3.77

H. Herman, Nanda Saputra, Magdalena Ngongo, Endang Fatmawati

{"title":"Delivering A Good Speech by Identifying the Interpersonal Meaning Found in Joe Biden’s Victory Speech: A Case on Systemic Functional Linguistics","authors":"H. Herman, Nanda Saputra, Magdalena Ngongo, Endang Fatmawati","doi":"10.36923/jicc.v22i3.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to classify the interpersonal meaning in Joe Biden’s victory speech. It is an interesting phenomenon because by revealing the interpersonal meaning, people can be assisted to be successful in communication. The researchers used a qualitative research design to answer the research question and chose content analysis since the results of data analysis were in descriptive phenomena, such as words, clauses, and utterances. The research findings showed that mood elements: found 174 subjects and 176 finites. Meanwhile, residue elements found 120 predicators, 133 complements, 9 mood adjuncts, 71 circumstantial adjuncts, 2 comment adjuncts, and 54 conjunctive adjuncts. In addition, the speech function identified 162 Statements, 4 Questions, and 11 Commands. Thus, it is concluded that Joe Biden tended to use finites, in contrast with comment adjuncts, and Statements, in contrast with questions (only 4 questions were found in his speech). This study also showed that the speaker was greatly assisted by using interpersonal meaning to make a good speech.","PeriodicalId":52519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intercultural Communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intercultural Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v22i3.77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

Abstract

This research aims to classify the interpersonal meaning in Joe Biden’s victory speech. It is an interesting phenomenon because by revealing the interpersonal meaning, people can be assisted to be successful in communication. The researchers used a qualitative research design to answer the research question and chose content analysis since the results of data analysis were in descriptive phenomena, such as words, clauses, and utterances. The research findings showed that mood elements: found 174 subjects and 176 finites. Meanwhile, residue elements found 120 predicators, 133 complements, 9 mood adjuncts, 71 circumstantial adjuncts, 2 comment adjuncts, and 54 conjunctive adjuncts. In addition, the speech function identified 162 Statements, 4 Questions, and 11 Commands. Thus, it is concluded that Joe Biden tended to use finites, in contrast with comment adjuncts, and Statements, in contrast with questions (only 4 questions were found in his speech). This study also showed that the speaker was greatly assisted by using interpersonal meaning to make a good speech.

查看原文本刊更多论文

从乔·拜登的胜选演说中发现的人际意义出发，发表好演说:以系统功能语言学为例

本研究旨在对乔·拜登胜选演讲中的人际意义进行分类。这是一个有趣的现象，因为通过揭示人际意义，人们可以在沟通中获得成功。研究人员采用定性研究设计来回答研究问题，并选择了内容分析，因为数据分析的结果是描述性现象，如单词、从句和话语。研究结果表明，情绪元素：发现174个受试者和176个有限元。同时，残基元素发现了120个表语、133个补语、9个语气附加语、71个间接附加语、2个评论附加语和54个连接附加语。此外，语音功能确定了162个陈述、4个问题和11个命令。因此，得出的结论是，乔·拜登倾向于使用限定词，而不是评论附加词，以及声明，而不是问题（在他的演讲中只发现了4个问题）。这项研究还表明，说话者在利用人际意义进行良好演讲方面得到了很大的帮助。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Intercultural Communication Social Sciences-Cultural Studies

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The goal of the journal is to promote research but also education and training in the area of intercultural communication. The journal is an outgrowth of the activities of NIC – the Nordic Network for Intercultural Communication. The great interest shown in the activities of NIC have pointed to a need for more journals employing a peer review procedure within the area of intercultural communication. By starting this journal, we hope to encourage more research and to facilitate contacts between interested researchers as well as to provide better possibilities for reviewed publication. We welcome contributions and reviews concerning all areas of intercultural communication.