Effect of different mowing intensities on phytomass production of permanent grassland in a warm and an arid region

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Ľ. Vozár, Miriama Lukács, P. Kovar, P. Hric
{"title":"Effect of different mowing intensities on phytomass production of permanent grassland in a warm and an arid region","authors":"Ľ. Vozár, Miriama Lukács, P. Kovar, P. Hric","doi":"10.15414/afz.2022.25.03.211-218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the work was to analyse the impact of different intensities of grassland exploitation on the productive capacity in the context of declining livestock numbers and the need for temporary or permanent extensification. The research was carried out in 2017–2020 in the locality of Žirany in the Nitra district, located in the temperate zone at the boundary between the continental and Atlantic-continental regions. Average annual temperatures are around 9 °C. The original semi-natural vegetation has been used for sheep grazing for many years. There were 8 experimental variants of use/cutting with different intensity of exploitation: var. 1 – abandoned unused, var. 2 – 3 × per year, var. 3 – 2 × per year, var. 4 – 1 × per year, var. 5 – 4 × – 3 × – 2 × – 2 × – 1 × per year, var. 6 – 1 × – 2 × – 3 × – 4 × per year, var. 7 – 3 × – 1 × – 1 × – 3 × and var. 8 – 2 × – 1 × – 1 × – 1 × – 2 × . By comparing the sum of yields for the entire 4-year annual cycle, we concluded that, with the exception of the 1 × annually mowed variant, all the others differentiated themselves from the abandoned stand by their increased production capacity. We also observed differentiation between fertilized and exploited variants into groups. The stand mowed 3 times annually (variant 2, 29.07 t/ha) was shown to be the most productive. The second group consisted of variants with production lower in the sum of 4 years by about 5 t/ha (3, 5, and 6). The same level of lower yield was then found on stands with temporarily reduced intensity of use (variants 7 and 8). In the effectiveness of applied nutrients on production growth, it was found that as the number of applications increased, nutrient use also increased. The average of the years in the overall assessment of the 4-year cycle showed the dynamics from the individual years and also confirmed the tendency of the highest nutrient use at a stable 3-cut use.","PeriodicalId":7312,"journal":{"name":"Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2022.25.03.211-218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the work was to analyse the impact of different intensities of grassland exploitation on the productive capacity in the context of declining livestock numbers and the need for temporary or permanent extensification. The research was carried out in 2017–2020 in the locality of Žirany in the Nitra district, located in the temperate zone at the boundary between the continental and Atlantic-continental regions. Average annual temperatures are around 9 °C. The original semi-natural vegetation has been used for sheep grazing for many years. There were 8 experimental variants of use/cutting with different intensity of exploitation: var. 1 – abandoned unused, var. 2 – 3 × per year, var. 3 – 2 × per year, var. 4 – 1 × per year, var. 5 – 4 × – 3 × – 2 × – 2 × – 1 × per year, var. 6 – 1 × – 2 × – 3 × – 4 × per year, var. 7 – 3 × – 1 × – 1 × – 3 × and var. 8 – 2 × – 1 × – 1 × – 1 × – 2 × . By comparing the sum of yields for the entire 4-year annual cycle, we concluded that, with the exception of the 1 × annually mowed variant, all the others differentiated themselves from the abandoned stand by their increased production capacity. We also observed differentiation between fertilized and exploited variants into groups. The stand mowed 3 times annually (variant 2, 29.07 t/ha) was shown to be the most productive. The second group consisted of variants with production lower in the sum of 4 years by about 5 t/ha (3, 5, and 6). The same level of lower yield was then found on stands with temporarily reduced intensity of use (variants 7 and 8). In the effectiveness of applied nutrients on production growth, it was found that as the number of applications increased, nutrient use also increased. The average of the years in the overall assessment of the 4-year cycle showed the dynamics from the individual years and also confirmed the tendency of the highest nutrient use at a stable 3-cut use.
不同割草强度对温暖干旱地区永久性草地植物群生产的影响
这项工作的目的是分析在牲畜数量下降以及需要临时或永久扩大的情况下,不同强度的草原开发对生产能力的影响。这项研究于2017年至2020年在尼特拉区的日兰尼地区进行,该地区位于大陆和大西洋大陆区域边界的温带。年平均气温约为9°C。原始的半天然植被多年来一直被用于牧羊。有8种不同开发强度的使用/切割实验变体:变体1–废弃未使用,变体2–3×每年,变体3–2×每年,变种4–1×每年,变异5–4×-3×-2×-2×-1×每年,变量6–1×-2×-3×-4×每年,变异株7–3×-1×-1×-3×和变异株8–2×-1×.1×-1×-2×。通过比较整个4年一年周期的产量总和,我们得出结论,除了每年修剪1倍的变种外,所有其他品种都通过提高生产能力与废弃林分区分开来。我们还观察到受精变体和利用变体之间的分化。林分每年割草3次(变体2,29.07 t/ha)被证明是最高产的。第二组由产量在4年内降低约5吨/公顷(3、5和6)的变体组成。然后在使用强度暂时降低的林分上发现了相同水平的较低产量(变体7和8)。在施用营养素对产量增长的有效性方面,发现随着施用次数的增加,营养素的使用也增加。4年周期总体评估中的年份平均值显示了各个年份的动态,也证实了在稳定的3个切口使用时最高营养素使用的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica
Acta Fytotechnica et Zootechnica Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信