IMMEDIATE EFFECT OF THREE METHODS OF NEURODYNAMIC TISSUE MOBILIZATION EXERCISES ON THE WALKING CAPACITY AMONG PATIENTS HAVING NEUROGENIC CLAUDICATION

Q4 Medicine
Anoop Aggarwal, S. Yadav, Madhusudan Tiwari, A. Mathur, Manda Chauhan
{"title":"IMMEDIATE EFFECT OF THREE METHODS OF NEURODYNAMIC TISSUE MOBILIZATION EXERCISES ON THE WALKING CAPACITY AMONG PATIENTS HAVING NEUROGENIC CLAUDICATION","authors":"Anoop Aggarwal, S. Yadav, Madhusudan Tiwari, A. Mathur, Manda Chauhan","doi":"10.1142/s0218957723500112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Neurogenic claudication presents itself as leg pain, paresthesia or cramp reproduced by walking and reduced by rest. It occurs more commonly in spinal canal Stenosis and the surgical decompression of the spine in this condition is rarely required. Nerve tissue may develop dynamic dysfunction such as adhesion and neural fibrosis can impair nerve mobility. Neurodynamic mobilization methods may enhance the neural tissue mobility and enhance physical function. The aim of this study was to explore the role of neural mobilization on the pain free walking distance (PFWD) and walking time among cases of spinal canal Stenosis presenting with neurogenic claudication. Methods: Forty eight patients diagnosed with neurogenic claudication were randomly and equally divided into any of the four groups: the “tensioner neural mobilization”; the “one ended slider neural mobilization” group; the “two ended slider neural mobilization” group; and the placebo group. The distance walked before pain onset and this pain-free walking time was recorded immediately before and after the neural mobilization intervention as per group’s protocol. Result: The “two ended slider method” of neural mobilization was more superior to the “one ended slider” or the “tensioner method” for improving walking capacity. Neither “single ended” slider neural mobilization nor placebo intervention caused any statistically significant improvement in the walking capacity among patients of neurogenic claudication. Conclusion: [Formula: see text]he “double slider method” of neural mobilization is most appropriate followed by “slider method” of neural mobilization and the “single ended slider method” for enhancing the walking distance and walking time among patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.","PeriodicalId":55895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218957723500112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Neurogenic claudication presents itself as leg pain, paresthesia or cramp reproduced by walking and reduced by rest. It occurs more commonly in spinal canal Stenosis and the surgical decompression of the spine in this condition is rarely required. Nerve tissue may develop dynamic dysfunction such as adhesion and neural fibrosis can impair nerve mobility. Neurodynamic mobilization methods may enhance the neural tissue mobility and enhance physical function. The aim of this study was to explore the role of neural mobilization on the pain free walking distance (PFWD) and walking time among cases of spinal canal Stenosis presenting with neurogenic claudication. Methods: Forty eight patients diagnosed with neurogenic claudication were randomly and equally divided into any of the four groups: the “tensioner neural mobilization”; the “one ended slider neural mobilization” group; the “two ended slider neural mobilization” group; and the placebo group. The distance walked before pain onset and this pain-free walking time was recorded immediately before and after the neural mobilization intervention as per group’s protocol. Result: The “two ended slider method” of neural mobilization was more superior to the “one ended slider” or the “tensioner method” for improving walking capacity. Neither “single ended” slider neural mobilization nor placebo intervention caused any statistically significant improvement in the walking capacity among patients of neurogenic claudication. Conclusion: [Formula: see text]he “double slider method” of neural mobilization is most appropriate followed by “slider method” of neural mobilization and the “single ended slider method” for enhancing the walking distance and walking time among patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.
三种神经动力组织动员运动方法对神经源性跛行患者步行能力的直接影响
目的:神经源性跛行表现为腿部疼痛,感觉异常或痉挛,行走时再现,休息时减轻。它更常见于椎管狭窄,在这种情况下很少需要脊柱手术减压。神经组织可能产生动力障碍,如粘连和神经纤维化可损害神经活动。神经动力学动员方法可以增强神经组织的活动性,增强身体机能。本研究旨在探讨神经活动对椎管狭窄伴神经源性跛行患者无疼痛行走距离(PFWD)和行走时间的影响。方法:将48例确诊为神经源性跛行的患者随机分为四组:“张力神经动员组”;“一端滑块神经活动”组;“两端滑块神经活动”组;还有安慰剂组。在神经活动干预前后立即记录疼痛发作前的步行距离和无痛步行时间。结果:神经活动“两头滑块法”在提高行走能力方面优于“一端滑块法”或“张紧器法”。在神经源性跛行患者中,“单端”滑块神经活动和安慰剂干预均未引起任何统计学上显著的行走能力改善。结论:[公式:见文]神经源性跛行患者增加步行距离和步行时间的方法以“双滑块法”为宜,其次为“滑块法”,最后为“单端滑块法”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Musculoskeletal Research
Journal of Musculoskeletal Research Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Journal of Musculoskeletal Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal aimed at publishing up-to-date contributions on clinical and basic research in the musculoskeletal system. Research into the musculoskeletal system has grown tremendously in the past few decades. Meanwhile, several outstanding journals in the field have appeared, but with a different emphasis and objective. With the growing number of studies in the field, the review process has become increasingly longer. We hope this journal will serve as a new forum for both scientists and clinicians to share their ideas and the results of their studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书