Anoop Aggarwal, S. Yadav, Madhusudan Tiwari, A. Mathur, Manda Chauhan
{"title":"IMMEDIATE EFFECT OF THREE METHODS OF NEURODYNAMIC TISSUE MOBILIZATION EXERCISES ON THE WALKING CAPACITY AMONG PATIENTS HAVING NEUROGENIC CLAUDICATION","authors":"Anoop Aggarwal, S. Yadav, Madhusudan Tiwari, A. Mathur, Manda Chauhan","doi":"10.1142/s0218957723500112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Neurogenic claudication presents itself as leg pain, paresthesia or cramp reproduced by walking and reduced by rest. It occurs more commonly in spinal canal Stenosis and the surgical decompression of the spine in this condition is rarely required. Nerve tissue may develop dynamic dysfunction such as adhesion and neural fibrosis can impair nerve mobility. Neurodynamic mobilization methods may enhance the neural tissue mobility and enhance physical function. The aim of this study was to explore the role of neural mobilization on the pain free walking distance (PFWD) and walking time among cases of spinal canal Stenosis presenting with neurogenic claudication. Methods: Forty eight patients diagnosed with neurogenic claudication were randomly and equally divided into any of the four groups: the “tensioner neural mobilization”; the “one ended slider neural mobilization” group; the “two ended slider neural mobilization” group; and the placebo group. The distance walked before pain onset and this pain-free walking time was recorded immediately before and after the neural mobilization intervention as per group’s protocol. Result: The “two ended slider method” of neural mobilization was more superior to the “one ended slider” or the “tensioner method” for improving walking capacity. Neither “single ended” slider neural mobilization nor placebo intervention caused any statistically significant improvement in the walking capacity among patients of neurogenic claudication. Conclusion: [Formula: see text]he “double slider method” of neural mobilization is most appropriate followed by “slider method” of neural mobilization and the “single ended slider method” for enhancing the walking distance and walking time among patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.","PeriodicalId":55895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Musculoskeletal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218957723500112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Neurogenic claudication presents itself as leg pain, paresthesia or cramp reproduced by walking and reduced by rest. It occurs more commonly in spinal canal Stenosis and the surgical decompression of the spine in this condition is rarely required. Nerve tissue may develop dynamic dysfunction such as adhesion and neural fibrosis can impair nerve mobility. Neurodynamic mobilization methods may enhance the neural tissue mobility and enhance physical function. The aim of this study was to explore the role of neural mobilization on the pain free walking distance (PFWD) and walking time among cases of spinal canal Stenosis presenting with neurogenic claudication. Methods: Forty eight patients diagnosed with neurogenic claudication were randomly and equally divided into any of the four groups: the “tensioner neural mobilization”; the “one ended slider neural mobilization” group; the “two ended slider neural mobilization” group; and the placebo group. The distance walked before pain onset and this pain-free walking time was recorded immediately before and after the neural mobilization intervention as per group’s protocol. Result: The “two ended slider method” of neural mobilization was more superior to the “one ended slider” or the “tensioner method” for improving walking capacity. Neither “single ended” slider neural mobilization nor placebo intervention caused any statistically significant improvement in the walking capacity among patients of neurogenic claudication. Conclusion: [Formula: see text]he “double slider method” of neural mobilization is most appropriate followed by “slider method” of neural mobilization and the “single ended slider method” for enhancing the walking distance and walking time among patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Musculoskeletal Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal aimed at publishing up-to-date contributions on clinical and basic research in the musculoskeletal system. Research into the musculoskeletal system has grown tremendously in the past few decades. Meanwhile, several outstanding journals in the field have appeared, but with a different emphasis and objective. With the growing number of studies in the field, the review process has become increasingly longer. We hope this journal will serve as a new forum for both scientists and clinicians to share their ideas and the results of their studies.