Possession tactics in the UEFA women’s EURO 2022 soccer tournament

IF 2.1 4区 教育学 Q1 Health Professions
P. O'Donoghue, Saffron Beckley
{"title":"Possession tactics in the UEFA women’s EURO 2022 soccer tournament","authors":"P. O'Donoghue, Saffron Beckley","doi":"10.1080/24748668.2023.2206273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of the current investigation was to compare different types of possession between the 8 quarter-finalists at the Euro 2022 soccer tournament and the 8 teams eliminated at the group stage, as well as compare the percentage of possessions leading to shots between different types of possession. Possessions were classified as having a slow pass rate if there were fewer than 1 pass played per 3s on average, otherwise they had a higher pass rate. Quarter-finalists had a significantly greater number of possessions of 9 passes or more with a slow pass rate than teams eliminated at the group stage (p = 0.028), and they created shots from a significantly greater percentage of these (p = 0.007). Possession type had a significant influence on the percentage of possessions leading to a shot (p < 0.001). Possessions of 9 or more passes with a slow pass rate were the most productive. The percentage of these that led to a shot was significantly greater than for possessions with the same number of passes played at a higher pass rate (p < 0.002). This shows that creating shots not only depends on possession length but also the rate of passes.","PeriodicalId":49049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport","volume":"23 1","pages":"48 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2023.2206273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purpose of the current investigation was to compare different types of possession between the 8 quarter-finalists at the Euro 2022 soccer tournament and the 8 teams eliminated at the group stage, as well as compare the percentage of possessions leading to shots between different types of possession. Possessions were classified as having a slow pass rate if there were fewer than 1 pass played per 3s on average, otherwise they had a higher pass rate. Quarter-finalists had a significantly greater number of possessions of 9 passes or more with a slow pass rate than teams eliminated at the group stage (p = 0.028), and they created shots from a significantly greater percentage of these (p = 0.007). Possession type had a significant influence on the percentage of possessions leading to a shot (p < 0.001). Possessions of 9 or more passes with a slow pass rate were the most productive. The percentage of these that led to a shot was significantly greater than for possessions with the same number of passes played at a higher pass rate (p < 0.002). This shows that creating shots not only depends on possession length but also the rate of passes.
欧足联2022年欧洲杯女子足球锦标赛中的控球战术
摘要本次调查的目的是比较2022年欧洲杯四分之一决赛的8支球队与小组赛淘汰的8支队伍之间不同类型的控球情况,并比较不同类型控球导致射门的控球百分比。如果平均每3分传球少于1次,控球被归类为传球率低,否则他们的传球率更高。四分之一决赛选手的9次或9次以上传球次数明显多于小组赛淘汰队(p = 0.028),并且他们的投篮命中率明显更高(p = 0.007)。占有类型对导致投篮的占有百分比有显著影响(p < 0.001)。拥有9次或9次以上传球且传球率较低是最有效的。在传球次数相同、传球率较高的情况下,投篮命中率明显高于控球命中率(p < 0.002)。这表明创造投篮不仅取决于控球长度,还取决于传球速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport aims to present current original research into sports performance. In so doing, the journal contributes to our general knowledge of sports performance making findings available to a wide audience of academics and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信