On Imagined Innocence: Emerging Black Feminist Approaches to Slavery Studies

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES
Candice Lyons
{"title":"On Imagined Innocence: Emerging Black Feminist Approaches to Slavery Studies","authors":"Candice Lyons","doi":"10.1353/fem.2023.a901592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Building on the scholarship of historians like Thavolia Glymph, who challenged depictions of chattel slavery as a (literally) paternalistic institution within which white planter women were reluctant participants, the three reviewed texts each continue this project of grappling with the nuances lost and the violences erased when slavery is regarded as the ultimate expression of patriarchal violence rather than a manifestation of white supremacy that traversed gender.Spanning the diaspora, with Fuentes rooting her work in urban Caribbean spaces, Jones-Rogers locating hers in the pre-Emancipation U.S. South, and Young looking to “the wake of the Black Atlantic and the sea tack toward the Indian Ocean” (12), these texts underscore that, across geographical contexts, the exploitation of Black women’s bodies and labor was not specifically the domain of white men; rather, such exploitation was often the means by which white slaveholding women sought to negotiate their own social and financial freedom. Collectively, these three works constitute a shift in the literature toward investigations of slavery’s histories that complicate presupposed notions of agency, power, solidarity, and innocence.","PeriodicalId":35884,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2023.a901592","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Building on the scholarship of historians like Thavolia Glymph, who challenged depictions of chattel slavery as a (literally) paternalistic institution within which white planter women were reluctant participants, the three reviewed texts each continue this project of grappling with the nuances lost and the violences erased when slavery is regarded as the ultimate expression of patriarchal violence rather than a manifestation of white supremacy that traversed gender.Spanning the diaspora, with Fuentes rooting her work in urban Caribbean spaces, Jones-Rogers locating hers in the pre-Emancipation U.S. South, and Young looking to “the wake of the Black Atlantic and the sea tack toward the Indian Ocean” (12), these texts underscore that, across geographical contexts, the exploitation of Black women’s bodies and labor was not specifically the domain of white men; rather, such exploitation was often the means by which white slaveholding women sought to negotiate their own social and financial freedom. Collectively, these three works constitute a shift in the literature toward investigations of slavery’s histories that complicate presupposed notions of agency, power, solidarity, and innocence.
论想象中的天真:新兴的黑人女权主义奴隶制研究方法
摘要:在Thavolia Glymph等历史学家的学术基础上,他对动产奴隶制作为一种(字面上)家长式制度的描述提出了质疑,在这种制度中,白人种植园主女性是不情愿的参与者,当奴隶制被视为父权制暴力的最终表现,而不是白人至上主义跨越性别的表现时,这三本被审查的文本都继续着这一项目,努力解决失去的细微差别和消除的暴力。这些文本跨越了海外,富恩特斯将她的作品植根于加勒比海的城市空间,Jones Rogers将她的作品定位于解放前的美国南部,Young则着眼于“黑大西洋的觉醒和向印度洋的海上航行”(12),这些文本强调,在不同的地理背景下,对黑人女性身体和劳动的剥削并不是白人男性的专属领域;相反,这种剥削往往是白人蓄奴妇女寻求谈判自身社会和经济自由的手段。这三部作品共同构成了文学向奴隶制历史调查的转变,使代理、权力、团结和无辜的预设概念复杂化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Feminist Studies
Feminist Studies Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信