Analysis of the Eid Al-Fitr Holiday Anomaly on Abnormal Return and Trading Volume Activity: Case Study of Jakarta Islamic Index During 2017-2020

F. Pribadi, Aldi Abilawa
{"title":"Analysis of the Eid Al-Fitr Holiday Anomaly on Abnormal Return and Trading Volume Activity: Case Study of Jakarta Islamic Index During 2017-2020","authors":"F. Pribadi, Aldi Abilawa","doi":"10.18196/jai.v23i1.12894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research aims: This research aims to determine whether there is a significant difference in the average abnormal return on the Jakarta Islamic Index on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2020 before and after the Eid al-Fitr holiday and find out whether there is a significant difference in the average trading volume activity on the Jakarta Islamic Index on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2020 before and after the Eid al-Fitr holiday.Design/Methodology/Approach: By utilizing an event study, the only significant difference was in the Average Trading Volume Activity (ATVA), showing that trading activity before the holiday was higher, and the opposite occurred in the 2020 period.Research findings: The first research result is that investors could not earn any abnormal return on post- and pre-event windows since the differences between post- and pre-average abnormal returns were insignificant. The second result is a significant Eid al-Fitr anomaly through trading volume activity patterns in companies listed on the Jakarta Islamic Index on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The results also indicate that the capital market in Indonesia is efficient in a semi-strong form of event in the pandemic era.Theoretical contribution/Originality: The anomalies in the market prove that the market is not always efficient, and it defies the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). These anomalies have addressed non-economic factors, such as religion or culture. As one of the anomalies in the market, this study on holiday had mixed results. In addition, the Jakarta Islamic Index was used since the event studied in this research was the Islamic holiday, and Indonesia has the largest Muslim population in the world.Practitioner/Policy implication: This study is expected to be a reference material and information for companies about how investors respond to the Ramadan effect.Research limitation/Implication: Regarding the sample, this study was still limited to companies listed in the Jakarta Islamic Index, which only consists of 30 companies, so it is advisable to use companies listed on the Indonesian Sharia Stock Index.","PeriodicalId":33157,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Investment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Investment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v23i1.12894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research aims: This research aims to determine whether there is a significant difference in the average abnormal return on the Jakarta Islamic Index on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2020 before and after the Eid al-Fitr holiday and find out whether there is a significant difference in the average trading volume activity on the Jakarta Islamic Index on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2020 before and after the Eid al-Fitr holiday.Design/Methodology/Approach: By utilizing an event study, the only significant difference was in the Average Trading Volume Activity (ATVA), showing that trading activity before the holiday was higher, and the opposite occurred in the 2020 period.Research findings: The first research result is that investors could not earn any abnormal return on post- and pre-event windows since the differences between post- and pre-average abnormal returns were insignificant. The second result is a significant Eid al-Fitr anomaly through trading volume activity patterns in companies listed on the Jakarta Islamic Index on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The results also indicate that the capital market in Indonesia is efficient in a semi-strong form of event in the pandemic era.Theoretical contribution/Originality: The anomalies in the market prove that the market is not always efficient, and it defies the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). These anomalies have addressed non-economic factors, such as religion or culture. As one of the anomalies in the market, this study on holiday had mixed results. In addition, the Jakarta Islamic Index was used since the event studied in this research was the Islamic holiday, and Indonesia has the largest Muslim population in the world.Practitioner/Policy implication: This study is expected to be a reference material and information for companies about how investors respond to the Ramadan effect.Research limitation/Implication: Regarding the sample, this study was still limited to companies listed in the Jakarta Islamic Index, which only consists of 30 companies, so it is advisable to use companies listed on the Indonesian Sharia Stock Index.
开斋节异常对异常回报和交易量活动的分析——2017-2020年雅加达伊斯兰指数的案例研究
研究目的:本研究旨在确定开斋节前后印尼证券交易所雅加达伊斯兰指数2017-2020年平均异常收益是否存在显著差异,以及开斋节前后印尼证券交易所雅加达伊斯兰指数2017-2020年平均交易量活跃度是否存在显著差异。设计/方法/方法:通过利用事件研究,唯一显著的差异是平均交易量活动(ATVA),显示假期前的交易活动更高,而2020年期间的情况正好相反。研究发现:第一个研究结果是投资者在事件后和事件前窗口无法获得任何异常收益,因为事件后和事件前的异常收益差异不显著。第二个结果是,通过在印度尼西亚证券交易所雅加达伊斯兰指数上市的公司的交易量活动模式,出现了明显的开斋节异常。结果还表明,在大流行时期,印度尼西亚的资本市场在半强事件形式下是有效的。理论贡献/独创性:市场的异常现象证明市场并不总是有效的,它违背了有效市场假说(EMH)。这些异常现象解决了非经济因素,如宗教或文化。作为市场的异常现象之一,这项关于假期的研究结果喜忧参半。此外,由于本研究研究的事件是伊斯兰节日,印度尼西亚是世界上穆斯林人口最多的国家,因此使用了雅加达伊斯兰指数。从业者/政策启示:本研究有望为企业提供有关投资者如何应对斋月效应的参考资料和信息。研究限制/启示:在样本方面,本研究仍然局限于雅加达伊斯兰指数的上市公司,该指数仅由30家公司组成,因此建议使用印度尼西亚伊斯兰指数的上市公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信