Applying Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA) to Improve Choking Risk Prevention in a Mental Health Setting: Analysis Outcomes and Lessons Learned on Human Factors Collaboration

Anthony Soung Yee, Laurel Cyr, Carleene Bañez, S. Gelmi, C. Gaulton, Trevor N. T. Hall
{"title":"Applying Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA) to Improve Choking Risk Prevention in a Mental Health Setting: Analysis Outcomes and Lessons Learned on Human Factors Collaboration","authors":"Anthony Soung Yee, Laurel Cyr, Carleene Bañez, S. Gelmi, C. Gaulton, Trevor N. T. Hall","doi":"10.1177/2327857923121034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the collaborative work performed as part of a patient safety and quality improvement choking risk prevention initiative in a specialty mental health hospital in Ontario, Canada. In 2021, Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Ontario Shores), in collaboration with the Healthcare Insurance Reciprocal of Canada (HIROC), conducted a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to identify potential failure modes for their choking risk prevention process. “Failure modes” refer to states in a process that have the potential for unintended consequences. The interdisciplinary project team developed and validated a current-state process map, through which identified all opportunities for process improvement. A thematic analysis of the barriers revealed 14 distinct failure modes, each of which were rated along three scales (Severity, Occurrence, and Detectability) to form a ranked list based on Risk Priority Number. As part of a prospective analysis, several system-based and people-based mitigations were generated for each of the failure modes. As a result of the FMEA, Ontario Shores developed, and is in the process of, implementing a choking risk prevention and risk mitigation strategies action plan. In addition, the authors offer some reflections on the collaborative work between the two organizations, in recognition of the opportunity for healthcare organizations to benefit from human factors expertise and principles of applied safety science, usability engineering, and user-centered design.","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"12 1","pages":"147 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857923121034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes the collaborative work performed as part of a patient safety and quality improvement choking risk prevention initiative in a specialty mental health hospital in Ontario, Canada. In 2021, Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (Ontario Shores), in collaboration with the Healthcare Insurance Reciprocal of Canada (HIROC), conducted a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to identify potential failure modes for their choking risk prevention process. “Failure modes” refer to states in a process that have the potential for unintended consequences. The interdisciplinary project team developed and validated a current-state process map, through which identified all opportunities for process improvement. A thematic analysis of the barriers revealed 14 distinct failure modes, each of which were rated along three scales (Severity, Occurrence, and Detectability) to form a ranked list based on Risk Priority Number. As part of a prospective analysis, several system-based and people-based mitigations were generated for each of the failure modes. As a result of the FMEA, Ontario Shores developed, and is in the process of, implementing a choking risk prevention and risk mitigation strategies action plan. In addition, the authors offer some reflections on the collaborative work between the two organizations, in recognition of the opportunity for healthcare organizations to benefit from human factors expertise and principles of applied safety science, usability engineering, and user-centered design.
应用失效模式效应分析(FMEA)改善心理健康环境中的窒息风险预防:人因协作的分析结果和经验教训
本文描述了加拿大安大略省一家专业精神卫生医院作为患者安全和质量改进窒息风险预防计划的一部分所开展的合作工作。2021年,安大略省海岸心理健康科学中心(安大略省海岸)与加拿大医疗保险互惠协会(HIROC)合作,进行了故障模式和影响分析(FMEA),以确定其窒息风险预防过程的潜在故障模式。“故障模式”是指过程中可能产生意外后果的状态。跨学科项目团队开发并验证了当前状态流程图,通过该图确定了流程改进的所有机会。对障碍的主题分析揭示了14种不同的故障模式,每种模式都按照三个等级(严重程度、发生率和可检测性)进行评级,以形成基于风险优先级的排名列表。作为前瞻性分析的一部分,为每种故障模式生成了几种基于系统和基于人员的缓解措施。作为FMEA的结果,安大略海岸制定并正在实施窒息风险预防和风险缓解战略行动计划。此外,作者对这两个组织之间的合作工作进行了一些反思,承认医疗保健组织有机会受益于人因专业知识和应用安全科学、可用性工程和以用户为中心的设计原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信