Social engineering and the disclosure of personal identifiable information: Examining the relationship and moderating factors using a population-based survey experiment

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Rick van der Kleij, Susanne van ’t Hoff-de Goede, S. V. D. van de Weijer, R. Leukfeldt
{"title":"Social engineering and the disclosure of personal identifiable information: Examining the relationship and moderating factors using a population-based survey experiment","authors":"Rick van der Kleij, Susanne van ’t Hoff-de Goede, S. V. D. van de Weijer, R. Leukfeldt","doi":"10.1177/26338076231162660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People tend to disclose personal identifiable information (PII) that could be used by cybercriminals against them. Often, persuasion techniques are used by cybercriminals to trick people to disclose PII. This research investigates whether people can be made less susceptible to persuasion by reciprocation (i.e., making people feel obligated to return a favour) and authority, particularly in regard to whether information security knowledge and positive affect moderate the relation between susceptibility to persuasion and disclosing PII. Data are used from a population-based survey experiment that measured the actual disclosure of PII in an experimental setting (N = 2426). The results demonstrate a persuasion–disclosure link, indicating that people disclose more PII when persuaded by reciprocation, but not by authority. Knowledge of information security was also found to relate to disclosure. People disclosed less PII when they possessed more knowledge of information security. Positive affect was not related to the disclosure of PII. And contrary to expectations, no moderating effects were found of information security knowledge nor positive affect on the persuasion–disclosure link. Possible explanations are discussed, as well as limitations and future research directions.","PeriodicalId":29902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminology","volume":"56 1","pages":"278 - 293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26338076231162660","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People tend to disclose personal identifiable information (PII) that could be used by cybercriminals against them. Often, persuasion techniques are used by cybercriminals to trick people to disclose PII. This research investigates whether people can be made less susceptible to persuasion by reciprocation (i.e., making people feel obligated to return a favour) and authority, particularly in regard to whether information security knowledge and positive affect moderate the relation between susceptibility to persuasion and disclosing PII. Data are used from a population-based survey experiment that measured the actual disclosure of PII in an experimental setting (N = 2426). The results demonstrate a persuasion–disclosure link, indicating that people disclose more PII when persuaded by reciprocation, but not by authority. Knowledge of information security was also found to relate to disclosure. People disclosed less PII when they possessed more knowledge of information security. Positive affect was not related to the disclosure of PII. And contrary to expectations, no moderating effects were found of information security knowledge nor positive affect on the persuasion–disclosure link. Possible explanations are discussed, as well as limitations and future research directions.
社会工程与个人身份信息的披露:使用基于人群的调查实验检验关系和调节因素
人们倾向于披露个人身份信息(PII),这些信息可能被网络罪犯用来攻击他们。通常,网络犯罪分子会使用说服技巧来诱骗人们披露个人身份信息。本研究调查了人们是否可以通过回报(即使人们感到有义务回报)和权威来减少对说服的易感性,特别是关于信息安全知识和积极影响是否调节对说服的易感性与泄露个人身份信息之间的关系。数据来自一项基于人群的调查实验,该实验测量了在实验环境中PII的实际披露情况(N = 2426)。结果显示了说服与披露之间的联系,表明人们在受到回报的说服时披露了更多的个人身份信息,而不是受到权威的说服。信息安全知识也与信息披露有关。当人们拥有更多的信息安全知识时,他们披露的个人身份信息较少。积极情绪与个人身份信息披露无关。与预期相反,信息安全知识对说服-披露关系没有调节作用,也没有正向影响。讨论了可能的解释,以及局限性和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Criminology
Journal of Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信