A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Inter-Ethnic Views of Ethics

Q2 Arts and Humanities
R. Taraban, S. Saraff, Serhii Zasiekin, R. Biswal
{"title":"A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Inter-Ethnic Views of Ethics","authors":"R. Taraban, S. Saraff, Serhii Zasiekin, R. Biswal","doi":"10.29038/eejpl.2022.9.1.tar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we describe a collaborative, cross-cultural project whose focus is on developing an interactive pedagogy for undergraduate students that delivers a culturally relevant ethical activity, using an internet platform to widen the scope of learning at an international level. The ongoing collaborative project described here is implemented through a website, the Ethical Engineer (https://ethicalengineer.ttu.edu), that provides an open and unique online digital platform for developing a community of students committed to the discussion of ethics from a global perspective. A goal of this project was to gain insights into similarities and differences between Indian, Ukrainian, and USA respondents in their reasoning about a hypothetical ethical dilemma. Two complementary methods of analysis were applied to students’ responses. First, a well-known method for text analysis, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2022) was used to identify topics and perspectives in students’ essays that distinguished the three groups. These analyses were followed by naïve Bayesian analyses that were used to further identify characteristic conceptual differences between the three ethnic groups. We discuss how the Ethical Engineer platform could be further developed by providing students with immediate substantive feedback to their written responses, in order to extend the learning benefits to students from participation on the website. The analytic methods described here demonstrate ways to gain knowledge of globally-diverse students’ thinking.","PeriodicalId":36553,"journal":{"name":"East European Journal of Psycholinguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Journal of Psycholinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2022.9.1.tar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper we describe a collaborative, cross-cultural project whose focus is on developing an interactive pedagogy for undergraduate students that delivers a culturally relevant ethical activity, using an internet platform to widen the scope of learning at an international level. The ongoing collaborative project described here is implemented through a website, the Ethical Engineer (https://ethicalengineer.ttu.edu), that provides an open and unique online digital platform for developing a community of students committed to the discussion of ethics from a global perspective. A goal of this project was to gain insights into similarities and differences between Indian, Ukrainian, and USA respondents in their reasoning about a hypothetical ethical dilemma. Two complementary methods of analysis were applied to students’ responses. First, a well-known method for text analysis, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2022) was used to identify topics and perspectives in students’ essays that distinguished the three groups. These analyses were followed by naïve Bayesian analyses that were used to further identify characteristic conceptual differences between the three ethnic groups. We discuss how the Ethical Engineer platform could be further developed by providing students with immediate substantive feedback to their written responses, in order to extend the learning benefits to students from participation on the website. The analytic methods described here demonstrate ways to gain knowledge of globally-diverse students’ thinking.
民族间伦理观念的心理语言学分析
在本文中,我们描述了一个合作的跨文化项目,其重点是为本科生开发一种互动教学法,该教学法提供与文化相关的伦理活动,利用互联网平台扩大国际层面的学习范围。这里描述的正在进行的合作项目是通过一个网站实施的,伦理工程师(https://ethicalengineer.ttu.edu),它提供了一个开放和独特的在线数字平台,用于发展一个致力于从全球角度讨论伦理的学生社区。该项目的目标是深入了解印度、乌克兰和美国受访者在对假设的道德困境进行推理时的异同。对学生的回答采用了两种互补的分析方法。首先,使用了一种著名的文本分析方法,语言调查和单词计数(LIWC2022)来确定学生论文中的主题和观点,以区分这三组。这些分析之后是naïve贝叶斯分析,用于进一步确定三个种族群体之间的特征概念差异。我们将讨论如何进一步发展道德工程师平台,为学生的书面答复提供即时的实质性反馈,从而使学生从参与网站中获得学习益处。这里描述的分析方法展示了获得全球多样化学生思维知识的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
East European Journal of Psycholinguistics
East European Journal of Psycholinguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信