Measurement of Peat Soil Shear Strength Using Wenner Four-Point Probes and Vane Shear Strength Methods

IF 1 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Irfan Ahmad Afip, S. Taib, K. Jusoff, Liyana Binti Ahmad Afip
{"title":"Measurement of Peat Soil Shear Strength Using Wenner Four-Point Probes and Vane Shear Strength Methods","authors":"Irfan Ahmad Afip, S. Taib, K. Jusoff, Liyana Binti Ahmad Afip","doi":"10.1155/2019/3909032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The general objective of this research was to measure the peat soil shear strength using Wenner four-point probes and vane shear strength methods. Specifically, the objective of this study was two-fold, namely, (a) investigating the relationship between laboratory soil resistivity and undrained shear strength and (b) determineing the relationship between in-situ soil resistivity and undrained shear strength. Data were randomly collected over six locations in Meranek, Sarawak, for in-situ test and three repetitions for each data were set based on three parameters. The selected parameters were soil density, moisture content, and salinity for both laboratory and in-situ test using Wenner four-point probes and vane shear method. The soil resistivity and vane shear strength readings for laboratory test were correlated with soil salinity, moisture content, and density. The R2 values showed a good correlation for soil salinity (R2 =0.8468) and density (R2 =0.9475), respectively. However, a weak correlation of R2 =0.1205 was observed for soil moisture. The R2 value for in-situ correlation between soil resistivity and three parameters (soil salinity, moisture content, and density) was R2 =0.8916. It can be concluded that the peat soil shear strengths of the study area using Wenner four-point probes from in-situ were (4.38 ohm.m) and laboratory was (2.47 ohm.m) and when using the vane shear strength method, in-situ was (23 kPA) and laboratory was (5 kPA). This study implies that the peat soil of the study area can be categorized as texture (soft loamy soil) and it is suitable for agriculture instead of construction. The relationship established between Wenner four-point probes and vane shear method can be beneficial for ground engineering design to enhance investigation on site suitability. Future work on DUALEM-421 technique should be emphasised for better subsurface exploration accuracy and resolve peat depth for an in-situ test.","PeriodicalId":45602,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/3909032","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3909032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The general objective of this research was to measure the peat soil shear strength using Wenner four-point probes and vane shear strength methods. Specifically, the objective of this study was two-fold, namely, (a) investigating the relationship between laboratory soil resistivity and undrained shear strength and (b) determineing the relationship between in-situ soil resistivity and undrained shear strength. Data were randomly collected over six locations in Meranek, Sarawak, for in-situ test and three repetitions for each data were set based on three parameters. The selected parameters were soil density, moisture content, and salinity for both laboratory and in-situ test using Wenner four-point probes and vane shear method. The soil resistivity and vane shear strength readings for laboratory test were correlated with soil salinity, moisture content, and density. The R2 values showed a good correlation for soil salinity (R2 =0.8468) and density (R2 =0.9475), respectively. However, a weak correlation of R2 =0.1205 was observed for soil moisture. The R2 value for in-situ correlation between soil resistivity and three parameters (soil salinity, moisture content, and density) was R2 =0.8916. It can be concluded that the peat soil shear strengths of the study area using Wenner four-point probes from in-situ were (4.38 ohm.m) and laboratory was (2.47 ohm.m) and when using the vane shear strength method, in-situ was (23 kPA) and laboratory was (5 kPA). This study implies that the peat soil of the study area can be categorized as texture (soft loamy soil) and it is suitable for agriculture instead of construction. The relationship established between Wenner four-point probes and vane shear method can be beneficial for ground engineering design to enhance investigation on site suitability. Future work on DUALEM-421 technique should be emphasised for better subsurface exploration accuracy and resolve peat depth for an in-situ test.
Wenner四点探针和十字板剪切强度法测定泥炭土剪切强度
本研究的总体目标是使用Wenner四点探针和叶片抗剪强度方法测量泥炭土的抗剪强度。具体而言,本研究的目的有两个,即(a)研究实验室土壤电阻率与不排水抗剪强度之间的关系,以及(b)确定现场土壤电阻率与未排水抗剪实力之间的关系。数据是在砂拉越州梅拉内克的六个地点随机收集的,用于现场测试,每个数据基于三个参数设置三次重复。选择的参数是土壤密度、含水量和盐度,用于实验室和现场测试,使用Wenner四点探针和叶片剪切法。实验室测试的土壤电阻率和叶片剪切强度读数与土壤盐度、含水量和密度相关。R2值分别与土壤盐度(R2=0.8468)和密度(R2=0.9475)具有良好的相关性。然而,对于土壤水分,观察到R2=0.1205的弱相关性。土壤电阻率与三个参数(土壤盐度、含水量和密度)之间的原位相关性R2值为R2=0.8916。可以得出结论,使用Wenner四点探针的研究区域的泥炭土剪切强度为(4.38 ohm.m),实验室为(2.47 ohm.m。本研究表明,研究区域的泥炭土可归类为质地(软壤土),适合农业而非建筑。文纳四点探针与叶片剪切法建立的关系有利于地面工程设计,加强对场地适宜性的调查。应强调DUALEM-421技术的未来工作,以提高地下勘探精度,并解决现场测试的泥炭深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Geophysics
International Journal of Geophysics GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Geophysics is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles in all areas of theoretical, observational, applied, and computational geophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信