Identifying high-risk children for dental caries in school settings: A simple predictive model.

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Danushi Wickramasinghe, Udaya Usgodaarachchi
{"title":"Identifying high-risk children for dental caries in school settings: A simple predictive model.","authors":"Danushi Wickramasinghe, Udaya Usgodaarachchi","doi":"10.4038/cmj.v67i4.9744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Untreated caries in permanent teeth is the most prevalent condition worldwide. Use of a simple, validated caries risk prediction tool will offer a low-cost mechanism to identify high-risk children for targeted preventive programmes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate a caries risk prediction model for 5-6-year-old Sri Lankan children. Methods Two case-control studies were done for model development and validation. Cases and controls were defined as 8-9-year-olds with and without permanent tooth caries respectively. Based on dental records and confirmation by clinical examination, 120 cases and 360 controls for model development, and 100 cases and 100 controls for model validation were selected. Data was collected using dental records and a pretested parental self-administered questionnaire. Risk predictors were identified by logistic regression analysis. Cut-off point was determined by plotting a ROC curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four risk predictors were identified: 'having 5 or more posterior decayed teeth' (OR= 2.1, 95% CI: 1.0 - 4.4), 'brushing frequency of once or less' (OR= 3.5, 95% CI: 2.1 - 6.0), 'not using fluoridated toothpaste' (OR= 3.2, 95% CI: 1.8 - 5.6) and 'consuming more than two snacks containing fermentable carbohydrates in between meals' (OR= 1.6, 95% CI: 0.9 - 2.9). A 10-point score was developed. Following external validation, a sensitivity of 31% (95% CI: 22.1% - 41.0 %) and a specificity of 87% (95% CI: 78.8% - 92.9 %) was obtained for a cut-off value of 2.5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model could be used to identify high-risk children, especially in areas with higher disease burdens.</p>","PeriodicalId":9777,"journal":{"name":"Ceylon Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceylon Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v67i4.9744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Untreated caries in permanent teeth is the most prevalent condition worldwide. Use of a simple, validated caries risk prediction tool will offer a low-cost mechanism to identify high-risk children for targeted preventive programmes.

Objectives: To develop and validate a caries risk prediction model for 5-6-year-old Sri Lankan children. Methods Two case-control studies were done for model development and validation. Cases and controls were defined as 8-9-year-olds with and without permanent tooth caries respectively. Based on dental records and confirmation by clinical examination, 120 cases and 360 controls for model development, and 100 cases and 100 controls for model validation were selected. Data was collected using dental records and a pretested parental self-administered questionnaire. Risk predictors were identified by logistic regression analysis. Cut-off point was determined by plotting a ROC curve.

Results: Four risk predictors were identified: 'having 5 or more posterior decayed teeth' (OR= 2.1, 95% CI: 1.0 - 4.4), 'brushing frequency of once or less' (OR= 3.5, 95% CI: 2.1 - 6.0), 'not using fluoridated toothpaste' (OR= 3.2, 95% CI: 1.8 - 5.6) and 'consuming more than two snacks containing fermentable carbohydrates in between meals' (OR= 1.6, 95% CI: 0.9 - 2.9). A 10-point score was developed. Following external validation, a sensitivity of 31% (95% CI: 22.1% - 41.0 %) and a specificity of 87% (95% CI: 78.8% - 92.9 %) was obtained for a cut-off value of 2.5.

Conclusion: The model could be used to identify high-risk children, especially in areas with higher disease burdens.

识别学校环境中患龋齿的高危儿童:一个简单的预测模型
背景:未经治疗的恒牙龋齿是世界上最普遍的情况。使用一种简单的、经过验证的龋齿风险预测工具将提供一种低成本的机制,以确定有针对性的预防规划的高危儿童。目的:建立并验证斯里兰卡5-6岁儿童龋病风险预测模型。方法:两项病例对照研究[p1]用于模型开发和验证。病例和对照组分别定义为8-9岁患有恒牙和不患有恒牙的儿童。根据牙科记录和临床检查确认,选择120例和360例对照进行模型开发,100例和100例对照进行模型验证。数据收集使用牙科记录和预先测试的父母自我管理问卷。通过logistic回归分析确定风险预测因素。通过绘制ROC曲线确定分界点。结果:确定了四个风险预测因素:“有5颗或更多的后牙蛀牙”(or = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.0 - 4.4),“刷牙频率为一次或更少”(or = 3.5, 95% CI: 2.1 - 6.0),“不使用含氟牙膏”(or = 3.2, 95% CI: 1.8 - 5.6)和“两餐之间食用含有可发酵碳水化合物的零食超过两次”(or = 1.6, 95% CI: 0.9 - 2.9)。制定了10分的评分标准。经过外部验证,灵敏度为31% (95% CI: 22.1% - 41.0%),特异性为87% (95% CI: 78.8% - 92.9%),临界值为2.5。结论:该模型可用于识别高危儿童,特别是在疾病负担较高的地区。(p1)执行
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ceylon Medical Journal
Ceylon Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Ceylon Medical Journal, is the oldest surviving medical journal in Australasia. It is the only medical journal in Sri Lanka that is listed in the Index Medicus. The CMJ started life way back in 1887 as the organ of the Ceylon Branch of the British Medical Association. Except for a brief period between 1893 and 1904 when it ceased publication, the CMJ or its forbear, the Journal of the Ceylon Branch of the British Medical Association, has been published without interruption up to now. The journal"s name changed to the CMJ in 1954.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信