A comparative analysis of paddy crop biotic stress classification using pre-trained deep neural networks

IF 8.2 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Naveen N. Malvade , Rajesh Yakkundimath , Girish Saunshi , Mahantesh C. Elemmi , Parashuram Baraki
{"title":"A comparative analysis of paddy crop biotic stress classification using pre-trained deep neural networks","authors":"Naveen N. Malvade ,&nbsp;Rajesh Yakkundimath ,&nbsp;Girish Saunshi ,&nbsp;Mahantesh C. Elemmi ,&nbsp;Parashuram Baraki","doi":"10.1016/j.aiia.2022.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The agriculture sector is no exception to the widespread usage of deep learning tools and techniques. In this paper, an automated detection method on the basis of pre-trained Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models is proposed to identify and classify paddy crop biotic stresses from the field images. The proposed work also provides the empirical comparison among the leading CNN models with transfer learning from the ImageNet weights namely, Inception-V3, VGG-16, ResNet-50, DenseNet-121 and MobileNet-28. Brown spot, hispa, and leaf blast, three of the most common and destructive paddy crop biotic stresses that occur during the flowering and ripening growth stages are considered for the experimentation. The experimental results reveal that the ResNet-50 model achieves the highest average paddy crop stress classification accuracy of 92.61% outperforming the other considered CNN models. The study explores the feasibility of CNN models for the paddy crop stress identification as well as the applicability of automated methods to non-experts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52814,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 167-175"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589721722000113/pdfft?md5=2c29b7fc4906082786b3953f41cebabd&pid=1-s2.0-S2589721722000113-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589721722000113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The agriculture sector is no exception to the widespread usage of deep learning tools and techniques. In this paper, an automated detection method on the basis of pre-trained Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models is proposed to identify and classify paddy crop biotic stresses from the field images. The proposed work also provides the empirical comparison among the leading CNN models with transfer learning from the ImageNet weights namely, Inception-V3, VGG-16, ResNet-50, DenseNet-121 and MobileNet-28. Brown spot, hispa, and leaf blast, three of the most common and destructive paddy crop biotic stresses that occur during the flowering and ripening growth stages are considered for the experimentation. The experimental results reveal that the ResNet-50 model achieves the highest average paddy crop stress classification accuracy of 92.61% outperforming the other considered CNN models. The study explores the feasibility of CNN models for the paddy crop stress identification as well as the applicability of automated methods to non-experts.

基于预训练深度神经网络的水稻作物生物胁迫分类比较分析
农业部门也不例外地广泛使用深度学习工具和技术。本文提出了一种基于预训练卷积神经网络(CNN)模型的水田作物生物胁迫自动检测方法。提出的工作还提供了从ImageNet权值迁移学习的主要CNN模型(Inception-V3, VGG-16, ResNet-50, DenseNet-121和MobileNet-28)之间的经验比较。本实验考虑了水稻作物开花和成熟生长阶段最常见和最具破坏性的三种生物胁迫——褐斑病、斑疹病和叶瘟病。实验结果表明,ResNet-50模型的平均水稻作物胁迫分类准确率最高,达到92.61%,优于其他CNN模型。本研究探讨了CNN模型在水稻作物应力识别中的可行性,以及自动化方法对非专家的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture
Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
21.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信