Jared Warren: Shadows of Syntax: Revitalizing Logical and Mathematical Conventionalism

IF 0.3 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Organon F Pub Date : 2022-02-28 DOI:10.31577/orgf.2022.29107

J. Peregrin

引用次数: 8

Abstract

I must start this review non-traditionally, with an apology. As the author of the book remarks (p. 120. footnote 47), “Peregrin (2017) ... cites my (2015), but seems to indicate that I reject unrestricted inferentialism, despite the paper actually being an extensive defense of unrestricted inferentialism.” This, unfortunately, is true. The relevant note in my text was mutilated during my revision of the text based on the proofreading of a native speaker. Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. However, what Warren now writes in his book makes me think that we might perhaps call it quits. Warren, despite knowing about my work, including my Inferentialism book (which he refers to in his book), does not shy away from claiming that he is the only current defender of unrestricted inferentialism. Part I of the book has two chapters. In the first, Warren distinguishes his version of conventionalism from some other versions, reaching the twin characterizations:

查看原文本刊更多论文

贾里德·沃伦:《句法的阴影:重振逻辑和数学的传统主义》

我必须非传统地以道歉开始这篇评论。正如这本书的作者所说(第120页)。脚注47)，“Peregrin(2017)……引用我的(2015)，但似乎表明我拒绝无限制推理主义，尽管这篇论文实际上是对无限制推理主义的广泛辩护。”不幸的是，这是事实。在我根据母语人士的校对修改文本时，我的文本中的相关注释被破坏了。我的错，我最大的错。然而，沃伦现在在他的书中所写的东西让我认为我们或许可以就此打住。尽管沃伦知道我的工作，包括我的推理主义书(他在书中提到了这本书)，但他并不回避声称他是目前唯一一个不受限制的推理主义的捍卫者。这本书的第一部分有两章。在第一篇中，沃伦将他的传统主义版本与其他版本区分开来，得出了两个特征:

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Organon F PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

20.00%

发文量

审稿时长

38 weeks

期刊介绍： Organon F publishes high-quality articles on the entire range of topics discussed in contemporary analytic philosophy. Accordingly, we invite authors to submit articles that address issues that belong, but are not limited, to philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, philosophy of science, epistemology, metaphysics and philosophical logic. We also consider analytically written articles on ethics, aesthetics, social philosophy, political philosophy and history of philosophy. The principal aim is to publish original articles that meet the standards typical of analytic philosophy, primarily those of conceptual clarity, precision and soundness of argumentation.