Examining the characteristics between time and distance gaps of secondary crashes

IF 2.7 4区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Xinyuan Liu, Jinjun Tang, Chen Yuan, Fan Gao, Xizhi Ding
{"title":"Examining the characteristics between time and distance gaps of secondary crashes","authors":"Xinyuan Liu, Jinjun Tang, Chen Yuan, Fan Gao, Xizhi Ding","doi":"10.1093/tse/tdad014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Understanding the characteristics of time and distance gaps between the primary and second crashes is crucial for preventing secondary crash occurrences and improving road safety. Although previous studies have tried to analyze the variation of gaps, there is limited evidence in quantifying the relationships between different gaps and various influential factors. This study proposed a two-layer Stacking framework to discuss the time and distance gaps. Specifically, the framework took Random Forests, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting as the base classifiers in the first layer and applied Logistic Regression as a combiner in the second layer. On this basis, the Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) technology was used to interpret the output of the Stacking model from both local and global perspectives. Through secondary crash identification and feature selection, 346 secondary crashes and 22 crash-related factors were collected from California interstate freeways. The results showed that the Stacking model outperformed base models evaluated by accuracy, precision, and recall indicators. The explanations based on LIME suggest that collision type, distance, speed, and volume are the critical features that affect the time and distance gaps. Higher volume can prolong queue length and increase the distance gap from the secondary to primary crashes. And collision types, peak periods, workday, truck involved, and tow away likely induce a long-distance gap. Conversely, there is a shorter distance gap when secondary roads run in the same direction and are close to the primary roads. Lower speed is a significant factor resulting in a long-time gap, while the higher speed is correlated with a short-time gap. These results are expected to provide insights into how contributory features affect the time and distance gaps and help decision-makers develop accurate decisions to prevent secondary crashes.","PeriodicalId":52804,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Safety and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Safety and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tse/tdad014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the characteristics of time and distance gaps between the primary and second crashes is crucial for preventing secondary crash occurrences and improving road safety. Although previous studies have tried to analyze the variation of gaps, there is limited evidence in quantifying the relationships between different gaps and various influential factors. This study proposed a two-layer Stacking framework to discuss the time and distance gaps. Specifically, the framework took Random Forests, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting as the base classifiers in the first layer and applied Logistic Regression as a combiner in the second layer. On this basis, the Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) technology was used to interpret the output of the Stacking model from both local and global perspectives. Through secondary crash identification and feature selection, 346 secondary crashes and 22 crash-related factors were collected from California interstate freeways. The results showed that the Stacking model outperformed base models evaluated by accuracy, precision, and recall indicators. The explanations based on LIME suggest that collision type, distance, speed, and volume are the critical features that affect the time and distance gaps. Higher volume can prolong queue length and increase the distance gap from the secondary to primary crashes. And collision types, peak periods, workday, truck involved, and tow away likely induce a long-distance gap. Conversely, there is a shorter distance gap when secondary roads run in the same direction and are close to the primary roads. Lower speed is a significant factor resulting in a long-time gap, while the higher speed is correlated with a short-time gap. These results are expected to provide insights into how contributory features affect the time and distance gaps and help decision-makers develop accurate decisions to prevent secondary crashes.
考察二次碰撞的时间间隔和距离间隔特征
了解一次碰撞和第二次碰撞之间的时间和距离差距的特征对于防止二次碰撞发生和改善道路安全至关重要。虽然以往的研究试图分析差距的变化,但在量化不同差距与各种影响因素之间的关系方面证据有限。本研究提出了一个双层堆叠框架来讨论时间和距离差距。具体而言,该框架在第一层以随机森林、梯度增强决策树和极端梯度增强作为基分类器,在第二层应用逻辑回归作为组合器。在此基础上,采用局部可解释模型不可知论解释(LIME)技术,从局部和全局两个角度对叠加模型的输出进行解释。通过二次碰撞识别和特征选择,收集了346起加州州际高速公路的二次碰撞和22起碰撞相关因素。结果表明,该模型在准确率、精密度和召回率指标上优于基本模型。基于LIME的解释表明,碰撞类型、距离、速度和体积是影响时间和距离差距的关键特征。更高的容量可以延长队列长度,并增加从次要崩溃到主崩溃之间的距离差距。而碰撞类型、高峰时段、工作日、涉及的卡车和拖车可能会导致长距离差距。相反,当次要道路与主干道方向相同且靠近主干道时,距离差距更短。较低的转速是导致长间隙的重要因素,而较高的转速与短间隙相关。这些研究结果将有助于深入了解各因素对时间和距离差距的影响,并帮助决策者制定准确的决策,以防止二次碰撞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Safety and Environment
Transportation Safety and Environment TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
32
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信