MORTALITY PREDICTION OF SURGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT PATIENTS USING DEEP LEARNING-BASED SURVIVAL MODELS

Q3 Multidisciplinary
L. M.K., S. Acharya, A. Kamath, D. Micheal
{"title":"MORTALITY PREDICTION OF SURGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT PATIENTS USING DEEP LEARNING-BASED SURVIVAL MODELS","authors":"L. M.K., S. Acharya, A. Kamath, D. Micheal","doi":"10.22452/mjs.vol41no3.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mortality prediction in surgical intensive care units (SICUs) is considered to be among the most critical steps in enforcing efficient treatment policies. This study aims to evaluate the performance of various deep learning models in predicting the mortality of patients admitted to SICUs. The survival of 2,225 adult patients admitted to SICUs was modeled using five salient deep learning-based survival models, namely, Cox-CC, Cox-Time, DeepSurv, DeepHit, and N-MTLR. The data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care II (MIMIC-II) database. The performance of the models was compared using the time-dependent concordance index (Ctd-index) and integrated Brier score (IBS). From among the five models, DeepSurv achieved the most accurate prediction, while Cox-Time demonstrated the least optimal predictive ability. For DeepSurv, Cox-CC, DeepHit, N-MTLR, and Cox-Time, the mean Ctd -index was 0.773, 0.767, 0.765, 0.732, and 0.659, and the mean IBS was 0.181, 0.192, 0.195, 0.212, and 0.225, respectively. DeepSurv, Cox-CC, and DeepHit yielded comparable performance. Deep learning models are free from the stringent assumptions inherent in standard survival models. Hence, these models are considered flexible alternatives to the standard approaches in scalable, real-world survival problems.","PeriodicalId":18094,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian journal of science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian journal of science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/mjs.vol41no3.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mortality prediction in surgical intensive care units (SICUs) is considered to be among the most critical steps in enforcing efficient treatment policies. This study aims to evaluate the performance of various deep learning models in predicting the mortality of patients admitted to SICUs. The survival of 2,225 adult patients admitted to SICUs was modeled using five salient deep learning-based survival models, namely, Cox-CC, Cox-Time, DeepSurv, DeepHit, and N-MTLR. The data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care II (MIMIC-II) database. The performance of the models was compared using the time-dependent concordance index (Ctd-index) and integrated Brier score (IBS). From among the five models, DeepSurv achieved the most accurate prediction, while Cox-Time demonstrated the least optimal predictive ability. For DeepSurv, Cox-CC, DeepHit, N-MTLR, and Cox-Time, the mean Ctd -index was 0.773, 0.767, 0.765, 0.732, and 0.659, and the mean IBS was 0.181, 0.192, 0.195, 0.212, and 0.225, respectively. DeepSurv, Cox-CC, and DeepHit yielded comparable performance. Deep learning models are free from the stringent assumptions inherent in standard survival models. Hence, these models are considered flexible alternatives to the standard approaches in scalable, real-world survival problems.
基于深度学习的生存模型的外科重症监护病房患者死亡率预测
外科重症监护室(SICU)的死亡率预测被认为是执行有效治疗政策的最关键步骤之一。本研究旨在评估各种深度学习模型在预测SICU患者死亡率方面的性能。使用五个显著的基于深度学习的生存模型,即Cox-CC、Cox-Time、DeepSurv、DeepHit和N-MTLR,对2225名入住SICU的成年患者的生存进行建模。这些数据是从重症监护医学信息集市II(MIMIC-II)数据库中提取的。使用时间依赖一致性指数(Ctd指数)和综合Brier评分(IBS)对模型的性能进行比较。在这五个模型中,DeepSurv的预测精度最高,而Cox-Time的预测能力最低。对于DeepSurv、Cox-CC、DeepHit、N-MTLR和Cox-Time,平均Ctd指数分别为0.773、0.767、0.765、0.732和0.659,平均IBS分别为0.181、0.192、0.195、0.212和0.225。DeepSurv、Cox CC和DeepHit的表现相当。深度学习模型摆脱了标准生存模型固有的严格假设。因此,在可扩展的现实世界生存问题中,这些模型被认为是标准方法的灵活替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Malaysian journal of science
Malaysian journal of science Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信